weinsink
Registered User
- Feb 8, 2018
- 694
- 302
Is it called mount loserville??Dion Phaneuf
Aki Berg
Vesa Toskala
Andrew Raycroft
Is it called mount loserville??Dion Phaneuf
Aki Berg
Vesa Toskala
Andrew Raycroft
What are you talking about, Aki Berg is in there. it's obviously the top 4 players of all time......Is it called mount loserville??
Bure, Bertuzzi, Petterson, q hughes.
Shutup I'm not biased.
Why the blatant disrespect to the ‘Berta god Messier?Bure, Bertuzzi, Petterson, q hughes.
Shutup I'm not biased.
I think this is the proper answer. However I voted for Crosby instead of Lemiuex just to have kind of one from each era in a sense. Howe - old school hockey, Orr - changing the game to more skill, Gretzky - dominating the skill era Bobby started, Crosby - the start of the 2 way game eraGretzky, Lemieux, Howe, Orr.
You're right that it feels weird. Lemieux is the 2nd best player in history. Arguably had a peak like Gretzky. No need to represent a goalie when they're a whole level behind Lemieux.The only member of the big 4 I can see taking out is Lemieux. His career mostly overlapped Gretzky's and Gretzky did everything Lemieux did and more, while playing the same position. Gretzky also did it first, showing that those video game numbers were possible. As great as Lemieux was, I think Gretzky, Howe and Orr all had more influence on the game and the players to come. Even though Lemieux was better, I can see putting Hasek or Roy to represent the goalie position, Crosby or Ovechkin to represent the most recent era (and Ovechkin for arguably the beat goalscorer), or someone like Morenz or Shore to represent eras before Howe. I'm honestly not sure who to go with, though it does feel weird not to go with Lemieux
just wanted to say i agree about making nets larger . going with the tweener hybrid rink would also help make more room for the talent to operate inRichard Orr Gretzky Ovechkin
based on their impact on the game as a whole.