Who did the best in Free Agency?

Oilyveins97*

Registered User
Jun 11, 2017
920
0
Manitoba
Girardi and Klein out and Shattenkirk and DeAngelo in is huge for the Rangers. There is still the possibility of Staal being bought out later this summer. Moving Stepan before his NMC kicked in and hogtying the team for another 4 years was also a great long term move.

Defense overhauled, bad contracts eliminated and cap troubles completely avoided. I'd call this a very, very good offseason.

Where did Klein go?
 

Black Tank

Registered User
Dec 12, 2006
2,010
1,491
a NYer in England
Where did Klein go?

He's going to retire due to a back injury, though nothing is official. If this is true, it explains a lot as to why his game just dropped off a cliffedge because KK is no slacker, he's a tough competitor and he was was always a team guy. To be fair, Girardi and Staal are the same, their bodies due to injuries just can't do it anymore.
 

LeafFever

Registered User
Feb 12, 2016
18,890
6,178
Well, Toronto's offense wasn't even in the top 5 last year even though they had the second most powerplays, so...

They were #6. I said "Deepest" did I not? They had the most 60 and most 50 point players in the entire NHL.
 

jw2

Registered User
Jun 13, 2012
7,081
430
Boston
Any non-Leafs fan think Toronto had a good offseason? I sure as hell dont.
 

Ogrezilla

Nerf Herder
Jul 5, 2009
75,545
22,071
Pittsburgh
They were #6. I said "Deepest" did I not? They had the most 60 and most 50 point players in the entire NHL.

So how does that make them the best without a doubt this year? I'd agree it's a really good group, and an argument can be made for best factoring the depth. But your original statement seems way over the top. Without a doubt the best?
 

nbwingsfan

Registered User
Dec 13, 2009
21,459
15,478
Leafs. That forward group is now without a doubt the best in the entire NHL.

The Pens definitely have something to say about that. Watch for both Guentzel and Sheary to be above 70 points.
 
Last edited:

WetcoastOrca

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jun 3, 2011
38,797
23,272
Vancouver, BC
Am I delirious? Or did I just follow the entire NHL and realize the Leafs had the deepest forward group BEFORE this signing.

If by deepest you mean the most serious thinkers, you may of may not be right. If you mean the best forward group then no. Just no.
 

KirkAlbuquerque

#WeNeverGetAGoodCoach
Mar 12, 2014
33,233
38,650
New York
NYR did a good job of nearly fixing their blue line which was a massive problem last season. Buying out Girardi, signing Smith and SHattenkirk to 4 year deals. Still have Staal to worry about, but if AV cuts his and Holden's minutes that top 4 is looking pretty good. Havent signed any fwds however... and i'd rather have an AHL callup play backup than spend money of Pavelec.
 

LeafFever

Registered User
Feb 12, 2016
18,890
6,178
If by deepest you mean the most serious thinkers, you may of may not be right. If you mean the best forward group then no. Just no.

Matthews/Marner/Nylander/Kadri/JVR/Marleau/Bozak/Komorov/Brown.

Who has that beat?
 

WetcoastOrca

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jun 3, 2011
38,797
23,272
Vancouver, BC
Matthews/Marner/Nylander/Kadri/JVR/Marleau/Bozak/Komorov/Brown.

Who has that beat?

Penguins quite easily.
Throw the Leafs in with Oilers, Caps and a few other teams like the Jets. Top 5 I'd say.
Personally I'd take the Pens easily fit next year and also the Oilers. Jets and Leafs are pretty close. I think Bozak and Marleau are both pretty overrated by Leaf fans.
 
Last edited:

David Bruce Banner

Nude Cabdriver Ban
Mar 25, 2008
7,975
3,261
Streets Ahead
Dallas improved the most. I like their moves and think they're gonna be dangerous.

Nashville strengthened an already strong squad.

If Mason is solid, Winnipeg might finally make some noise rather than just being disappointing.

The Canucks brought in some decent placeholders... they'll still suck, but at least they won't be icing unready kids and out of their depth AHLers.
 

Ogrezilla

Nerf Herder
Jul 5, 2009
75,545
22,071
Pittsburgh
Matthews/Marner/Nylander/Kadri/JVR/Marleau/Bozak/Komorov/Brown.

Who has that beat?

Crosby/Malkin/Kessel/Guentzel/Sheary/Hornqvist/Rust/Hagelin

Pens do need a 3C though. As of right now, Leafs have a bit more depth, mostly because the Pens haven't found a 3C yet. But I'd say the Pens top end advantage is bigger than the Leafs' depth advantage. I mean, Pens have the 1st, 2nd, and 4th best players of the combined lists. That's pretty big.
 

ijuka

Registered User
May 14, 2016
22,590
15,282
Leafs have a strong offense for sure but I'd certainly pick the offense of the team with two of the three best centers in the world over them that recently got carried into two stanley cups mainly by their offense. Maybe Leafs are in contention after their forwards manage to accomplish more than barely managing to scrape their way into a first round exit.
 

TDK67

Registered User
Apr 17, 2016
3,261
969
I threw the below table together quickly from data in stats.hockeyanalysis.com. It's each team's "2016-17 Goal & Point Totals From Forwards Only". Shot% is in there too and it's ranked by total points right now.

377oafm.png


It's not 100% accurate because it's not separating players' performance for teams pre-deadline and post-deadline if they were traded, however glancing at those trades I didn't see any major transactions that would have substantially moved any team's needle. Someone can correct me if I'm wrong on that.

My thoughts:

Holy crap Minnesota! Didn't realize their forwards were so offensively potent. The exchange of Pominville for Ennis & Foligno is a net loss in points but a net gain in goals. They were also riding the 4th highest shot % among forward groups in the league last year.

The next 4 teams seem expected (PIT, WSH, TOR, & EDM) but everyone other than Toronto has actually lost goal scoring and points. In PIT & WSH's cases it's actually a pretty significant amount. Only Toronto made a significant gain in their forward core with Marleau coming in and no other major trades or losses from their forward group. I also don't see Toronto as being particularly lucky given them having the 3rd lowest shot % among the Top 10 forward groups in the league. I also realize that this doesn't account for rookies that will come in and contribute for various teams but I'm not sure any of the Top 5 teams are expecting a rookie to come in and do 20-25 goals and 40-50 points.

So is Toronto guaranteed to have the best forward group in the NHL next year? No, because nothing is guaranteed. Do they look poised to have the best forward group based on how every team performed last year and what players they've added/substracted so far? Yes.

Ultimately, the idea of Toronto having the best forward group next year is not nearly as outlandish as many knee-jerkers made it seem in this thread.

In reality the craziest post about Toronto in this thread came from the guy who listed nearly 20 teams that could outscore the Leafs. All biases aside, the Leafs proved they're an upper echelon offensive team in the league last year and there's really nothing to indicate they'll massively drop in that aspect either in advanced metrics (shot percentages, scoring chance generation, etc) or in their personnel gains/losses in this off-season.
 
Last edited:

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad