Kinbote said:You’re absolutely correct, but I’m talking about the future and not too far in the future either, but yeah right now there’s no doubt about what you say. Things go in cycles and the US is coming out of a dry cycle right now. Look at the last few NHL entry drafts, the number of high picks for the US has gone up, this next draft there will probably be 10-11 first rounders for USA hockey, which may actually be more than what Canada gets. As long as I’ve followed the game there has never been this many top rated Americans coming up through their system. And from what I’ve seen and read this is nothing but the tip of the iceberg, like I said in a previous post the US has already passed Canada in registered players, so they have the quantity all they have to do is work on the quality .
Don’t forget their best has already beaten our best. Remember the 96 World Cup? And those players came from a system that had a player pool half the size of what they have now.
therealdeal said:So they managed to win 1 tournament 10 years ago? Oh, and the junior one, okay 2, but thats not even best on best.
Canada is still producing far more top level talent in every facet of the game, offense, defense, goaltending. The US is the top rated team because Canada's best players are too good. And after Kessel, who is their phenom of sorts?
nomorekids said:Kyle Okposo
therealdeal said:The US is the top rated team because Canada's best players are too good.
Kinbote said:Okay, if it makes you sleep better at night.
therealdeal said:Ask yourself this question, if Crosby was in the tournament, who would have the best player between Canada and the States?
nomorekids said:If ifs and buts were candy and nuts...
therealdeal said:Yeah, IF only our 18 year old wasn't leading his team in scoring, unlike you're 18 year olds who are projected to be pretty good when they one day make the NHL.
Well you're right, America takes the title.
nomorekids said:See, this kills me. Even if the USA wins gold this year, there will be those like yourself who will forever try to take something away from it. Always out to apply an asterisk. "Well, if we had CROSBY and BRULE..." Never willing to just shut up and give credit where it's due. "Well, yeah they won gold in '03, but it was only because Fleury crapped the bed." There's always an excuse. Does the concept of sportsmanship mean nothing to you?
therealdeal said:Yeah, IF only our 18 year old wasn't leading his team in scoring, unlike you're 18 year olds who are projected to be pretty good when they one day make the NHL.
Well you're right, America takes the title.
You're being ignorant and completely confused about the point of this entire thread.therealdeal said:So they managed to win 1 tournament 10 years ago? Oh, and the junior one, okay 2, but thats not even best on best.
Canada is still producing far more top level talent in every facet of the game, offense, defense, goaltending. The US is the top rated team because Canada's best players are too good. And after Kessel, who is their phenom of sorts?
Claypool* said:I think people are forgetting how good a team Czechoslovakia would be today.
psycho_dad said:...sweden is also high on it, but soccer is their main thing.
Jovanovski = Norris said:Maybe in 30 years, they may challenge Canada for the #1 spot. Maybe 100 years later, they may surpass Canada. Nothing is infinite in this discussion.
Jovanovski = Norris said:With the arrival of Gretzky in LA, a huge US market was opened up. A generation of players picked up hockey and are now breaking into the NHL. Those players are the various youngsters I've named above. With Gretzky's arrival in LA in 1993, it must have had an impact in this generation of super prospects (Suter, Lee, Johnson (Erik), Johnson (Jack), Skille, Kessel, Parise, Wheeler, Schremp, Ryan, Kesler, Montoya, et al).
As more and more markets become opened up through burgeoning NHL franchises in places like Columbus, Tampa Bay, Carolina, Atlanta and other places, more and more American players will try hockey. The population of the US is tens times bigger than that of Canada. If you think critically, it will only be a matter of time before more Americans grow accustomed to hockey. And if hockey is such an extraordinary game as all of us seem to believe - the kids in the US will start to play more hockey. If that is the case, can you envision the possibilties of USA hockey by 2020? By 2050? By 2100?
Jagr314 said:I would have thought never, but once another nation picks up the sport who's to say how long before they will be better. I'll bet the people in the U.S 50 years ago would have never thought that countries like Cuba, and the Dominican Republic could field better baseball teams than the U.S. With that I don't think that a country's population holds any weight in this argument. Even the last Olympics when the U.S. did not win the gold medal in basketball, I was floored. Even though we didn't have our best, I thought we had enough. Other countries are simply catching up. So, I don't think that it is out of the realm of possibility that the U.S. could catch up.
VOB said:Yes, other countries have certainly made gains on us, but I still say we are the best in baseball and basketball.
As for hockey, demographics just aren't there. As long as hockey remains an affluent "white" sport in this country, the game will never open up to the masses.
As for soccer, of course we are getting better and will soon challenge for world supremacy (watch out Brazil!) since there are now more kids playing that sport than there are playing any other sport in this country.