Stizzle
Registered User
- Feb 3, 2012
- 13,209
- 23,193
I thought Couts really played like a star player in this tournament.
Indeed... **** you, Berube.
I thought Couts really played like a star player in this tournament.
I thought Couts really played like a star player in this tournament.
G and Couts were great today! Couts was one of the best forwards in the first period
Screw ROR, Flyers need this guy.
So to finish the tournament:
Giroux: 10GP, 3G, 7A, 10P, +11. (Canada's de facto 1C, Canada's best Forward, Best player in Final, 2nd amongst all tournament forwards in +/-.)
Couturier: 10GP 3G, 4A, 7P, +13. (Led all tournament forwards in +/-.)
Voracek: 10GP, 3G, 7A, 10P, +0.
Raffl: 7GP, 1G, 2A, 3P, -2. (led Austria in points, Forward TOI and +/-.)
Schenn: 2GP, 1G, 0A, 1P, +4.
Streit: 8GP, 0G, 2A, 2P, -5.
Lauridsen: 7GP, 0G, 1A, 1P, -5.
i believe it has also been said yesterday that couturier has finished the whole tournament without having any goal against scored at 5 on 5, if it stayed like this its even more impressive
Maybe there's a schism between NHL Russians and KHL Russians. KHLers "love their country more" or something.
The Russian program just seems to be a total gongshow. Like how they tried to tie the whole Ukraine/West mess into things right before their team lost to the US. Why even do that?
On the ice they really need to overhaul their development for defensemen. They are so far behind Canada, USA, & Sweden in that regard.
I think a problem is that they pigeon hole their players at a young age into a certain role. I know Zadorov left to come over Canada because he was unhappy with the way he was being developed. He felt they weren't giving him enough of chance to be an offensive player.
Yes, the lack of D talent coming from Russia is pretty strange. They have plenty of offensive talent. they have plenty of guys who can play hockey.
I would theorize that their youth development isn't as structured and system-oriented as NA development. We can see the results in the number of highly creative skilled forwards who seem confused on defense. While such development seems to have benefits for flashy offense, I can't imagine it being a good way to produce reliable defensemen unless they're pure naturals.
Debate the topic, not the poster.
What Couturier showed at the world champs is how dangerous he can be offensively using his body down low and getting to the net. He doesn't need to score 25 goals to be good offensively when he can protect the puck and make passes to open teammates like that Ekblad goal.