Toggle sidebar

News Article: What would the Kings Offer in a trade for E. Kane

BigBrown

BigBrown

Fly at eleven.
Feb 2, 2010
5,935
1,449
Sweden
Wow, that report is just so lazy.

[...] but the team is believed to be willing to listen, in the event a package comes across their table that is too good to pass up.
Click to expand...

Isn't a package "that is too good to pass up" by its very definition always gonna result in a trade for any player on any team? I mean it's literally too good to pass on. If an offer came in tomorrow for Crosby that was too good to pass up the Pens would make that trade. I have no idea what such an offer would entail but since it's too good to pass on it clearly would result in Crosby being traded. So lazy...

Anyway, sorry for that sidetrack. I think the value is probably there, most people that like to discuss trade value offer only scraps and picks so kudos for including Voynov. I don't think the deal would be advisable for the Kings, Voynov is too important as a top 4 d-man, but I think the value is fair.
 

KingKopitar11*

Guest
Realistically they would want Kopitar

Trouba and Kane

For Kopitar
 

apadilla

Registered User
Dec 27, 2007
1,619
336
BigBrown said:
Wow, that report is just so lazy.



Isn't a package "that is too good to pass up" by its very definition always gonna result in a trade for any player on any team? I mean it's literally too good to pass on. If an offer came in tomorrow for Crosby that was too good to pass up the Pens would make that trade. I have no idea what such an offer would entail but since it's too good to pass on it clearly would result in Crosby being traded. So lazy...

Anyway, sorry for that sidetrack. I think the value is probably there, most people that like to discuss trade value offer only scraps and picks so kudos for including Voynov. I don't think the deal would be advisable for the Kings, Voynov is too important as a top 4 d-man, but I think the value is fair.
Click to expand...

Agree with your comment on Voynov. Salary does need to go the other way though, and I don't think Winnipeg would be satisfied with us inserting Williams for Voynov.
 

apadilla

Registered User
Dec 27, 2007
1,619
336
KingKopitar11 said:
Realistically they would want Kopitar

Trouba and Kane

For Kopitar
Click to expand...

this would be monster. The Kings would want a little bit more though, like Winnipeg's upcoming 1st, and the Kings would then add in AMart.

aka

Trouba, Kane, 1st

For Kopitar, AMart

I'd (Kings) pass though.
 
Ollie Weeks

Ollie Weeks

the sea does not dream of you
Feb 28, 2008
13,250
2,546
I'd love Kane, but I'd sooner have a slight hole on LW than a big one on D.
 
etherialone

etherialone

dialed in your mom
Mar 6, 2008
12,987
0
The Ether
I don't see the Kings making any deal that would take away key/core players to add a player at this point.

If Pearson can't be our LW (I think he can) then we will likely make certain that our D is exactly where we want it (which it pretty much is today, they are really starting to gel) and then do the same for our bottom 6 )which is looking very good so far).

No reason to even offer on Kane. We won a cup without a top 6 LW so if what we have on board isn't enough I can't see any reason to move two core players for one. That would be a mistake in this situation.
 
Last edited:
KingCanadain1976

KingCanadain1976

Registered User
Jul 8, 2009
18,345
1,893
Thunder Bay Ont. Can
Tonellisghost said:
I don't see the Kings making any deal that would take away key/core players to add a player at this point.

If Pearson can't be our LW (I think he can) then we will likely make certain that our D is exactly where we want it (which it pretty much is today, they are really starting to gel) and then do the same for our bottom 6 )which is looking very good so far).

No reason to even offer on Kane. We won a cup without a top 6 LW so if what we have on board isn't enough I can't see any reason to move two core players for one. That would be a mistake in this situation.
Click to expand...

Um I don't normally nit pick with you tg but Brown is a top 6 lw in the league also happens to be our captain. I think what you mean to say would be we won a cup with only one top 6 left winger. Other wise totally agree with what your saying No need to offer on Kane especially now maybe at the deadline even then I see Ott being looked at first. No way we open up a even bigger hole at d by trading slava
 
KingCanadain1976

KingCanadain1976

Registered User
Jul 8, 2009
18,345
1,893
Thunder Bay Ont. Can
apadilla said:
If Winnipeg's Kane is put on the market, what do you think the cost would be for the Kings?

I figure something like:

1st in 2014
2nd in '14 or '15 (Toronto's Pick)
Voinov (cost isn't cheap)
Clifford

Too much?

http://www.thefourthperiod.com/news/wpg131112.html
Click to expand...

way to much imo the king would never trade voynov It would open to big a hole in there defense sorry. The offer I could see would be
Forbert
Clifford
Stoll
the Toronto pick 2nd
Does the jets take it ? I doubt it but that's the best I see us offering.
 
Basilisk

Basilisk

Registered User
Aug 5, 2012
1,912
356
KingCanadain1976 said:
way to much imo the king would never trade voynov It would open to big a hole in there defense sorry. The offer I could see would be
Forbert
Clifford
Stoll
the Toronto pick 2nd
Does the jets take it ? I doubt it but that's the best I see us offering.
Click to expand...


I like this, but the Jets would DEMAND at least one 1st round pick. Do you blame them?
 
onlyalad

onlyalad

The bounce
Jan 13, 2008
7,163
993
KingCanadain1976 said:
Um I don't normally nit pick with you tg but Brown is a top 6 lw in the league also happens to be our captain. I think what you mean to say would be we won a cup with only one top 6 left winger. Other wise totally agree with what your saying No need to offer on Kane especially now maybe at the deadline even then I see Ott being looked at first. No way we open up a even bigger hole at d by trading slava
Click to expand...
Nit pic
Brown is right winger playing left wing
 
etherialone

etherialone

dialed in your mom
Mar 6, 2008
12,987
0
The Ether
KingCanadain1976 said:
Um I don't normally nit pick with you tg but Brown is a top 6 lw in the league also happens to be our captain. I think what you mean to say would be we won a cup with only one top 6 left winger. Other wise totally agree with what your saying No need to offer on Kane especially now maybe at the deadline even then I see Ott being looked at first. No way we open up a even bigger hole at d by trading slava
Click to expand...

You are completely right. I should have mentioned DB as our having one very good LW and then an opening. I take DB for granted at times.
 
johnjm22

johnjm22

Pseudo Intellectual
Aug 2, 2005
19,754
15,242
Kane is good, not great.

The idea that the Kings would move, or should move, one of Brown/Kopitar for him is absolute rubbish.
 
Reclamation Project

Reclamation Project

Cut It All Right In Two
Jul 6, 2011
34,135
3,783
Not interesting in gutting our team for one player, no matter how much potential they have.

I wouldn't trade Kopitar for anyone.
 
Rorschach

Rorschach

Who the f*** is Trevor Moore?
Oct 9, 2006
11,274
1,842
Los Angeles
At 5.25 mil a year, I don't see him in a Kings uniform even if all we traded for him was picks, cap dumps and 2nd tier prospects.

Now if he was the same caliber of player and a rugged defenseman, then I'm looking to make a deal.
 

sinister6000

Registered User
Apr 30, 2013
546
200
Give Dean Lombardi 1st, and 2nd round picks, and he can find snipers, power forwards, and top 4 defensemen. They shoud'nt trade any more picks, let Dean continue to do what he does best, draft.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Ad

Latest posts

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad

Top Bottom