Proposal: What would it take Price to the Canucks?

THE Green Man

Registered User
Dec 27, 2013
2,965
721
Narnia
This is not a must year at all for the Canucks to make the playoffs their going to be the last place team in the Pacific division. Montreal yes is in a slight rebuild or retool so to speak but these two clubs for a trade like that makes no sense.
Try last place by a mile in the Western Conference and hopefully last in the league. I can't wait to finish last and still draft 4th overall.
Great post!!!!!

It’s posts like these that make HF really worth coming to.

As far as your post goes, I think trading for Price is an excellent idea, but I’d stay away from that Weber contract. I don’t think Weber will age well and that contract is going to be Brent Seabrook level bad in my opinion.

The Canucks should absolutely attempt to get Price though.

I would Montreal our 1st, on the condition that they take a few bad contracts of ours (Eriksson and Gagner).

:clap:
Do the Canucks need goaltending, yes. But they also need a whole new defence and 2 more high end forwards to even be playoff relevant. Trading our 1st round pick, that will be a high lottery pick in a draft in our own backyard is the absolute last thing we can consider doing. Unless it's a young superstar available, which Price is not anymore than it just makes absolutely no sense. [MOD]
 

82Ninety42011

Registered User
Jul 2, 2011
7,585
5,538
Abbotsford BC
Considering Weber and Price are over paid I'm pretty sure nobody is giving up cost controlled young assets for them especially a rebuilding team like Vancouver. A win now team missing a goalie or RHD might bite on one or the other with retention but not Vancouver at this time.
 

member 290103

Guest
Benning would be all over this. I suspect he would give up Horvat, Hughes, an unprotected 1st - whatever you want. Price is precisely what he values in a pro - overpaid, overrated, and on the downside of his career.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 13 others

WhatWhat

Registered User
Aug 7, 2014
5,685
1,119
Forget the proposal... Why in Sams f*** is this a "must make the playoffs" year for the Nucks??? If anything this is a must suck year to get that last stud pick before trying to ramp up with the kids they got now
 

Spirit of 67

Registered User
Nov 25, 2016
7,061
4,938
Aurora, On.
There has been discussion in Canucks land about whether we should tank or try to make the playoffs and I believe this year is a “must” year for the Canucks to make the playoffs. One way to do this is by trading this for Carey Price. The Habs seems to be in a rebuilding stage and trending downward while the Canucks are on the upswing and trending upward, looking to make the playoffs. Maybe the two teams can help each other. Montreal wants young pieces to move forward with and Vancouver needs immediate help on the back end and in goal. So Therefore I propose the following:

Markstrom
Demko
Juolevi
Virtanen
2020 1st
2019 2nd

for

Carey Price
Shea Weber

If I were Montreal, all it would cost is plane fare.
 

405Exit

Registered User
Mar 15, 2018
2,442
424
Forget the proposal... Why in Sams **** is this a "must make the playoffs" year for the Nucks??? If anything this is a must suck year to get that last stud pick before trying to ramp up with the kids they got now

Yah I don’t understand this either. Aren’t the Nucks rebuilding? I think last thing they would want is a over priced goalie. See what I did there?
 

HockeyDBspecialist

Habs 2019 cup champ
Jan 30, 2018
6,000
3,386
Montreal
Why in the world would this be a "must" year for the Canucks to make the playoffs? It's pretty much the opposite of that. Also holy crap is that an awful proposal. Price and Weber's contracts are so awful they are pretty much untradeable. Especially to a rebuilding team.
Booooooo.

people saying price contract is "untradable" are so disconnected to the reality of hockey.
 
  • Like
Reactions: stanley25

405Exit

Registered User
Mar 15, 2018
2,442
424
people saying price contract is "untradable" are so disconnected to the reality of hockey.

Majority of the people in this thread are asking why the Nucks would do it. Not many are saying it’s untradeable . Atleast I’m not. I just want to know why a rebuilding team would trade rebuilding assets for Price. It kinda defeats the purpose of rebuilding you know?
 

Devilsrock17

Registered User
Jun 20, 2018
472
65
Try last place by a mile in the Western Conference and hopefully last in the league. I can't wait to finish last and still draft 4th overall.

Do the Canucks need goaltending, yes. But they also need a whole new defence and 2 more high end forwards to even be playoff relevant. Trading our 1st round pick, that will be a high lottery pick in a draft in our own backyard is the absolute last thing we can consider doing. Unless it's a young superstar available, which Price is not anymore than it just makes absolutely no sense. [MOD]
I think last place in the league is between the Senators Canucks .
 

didimentionlarseller

Snipers are a dying bread in the NHL
Nov 23, 2014
13,887
5,565
St Henri
no they wouldnt and if they could do that for the nucks that means they could do it for the habs--are the habs headed to the promise land? only if that promise land is a high draft pick

our locker room is plagued with bad character I don't think Vancouver has a roster like Montreal's so it would work perfectly there
 

Brock Radunske

안양종합운동장 빙상장
Aug 8, 2012
16,787
4,701
There has been discussion in Canucks land about whether we should tank or try to make the playoffs and I believe this year is a “must” year for the Canucks to make the playoffs. One way to do this is by trading this for Carey Price. The Habs seems to be in a rebuilding stage and trending downward while the Canucks are on the upswing and trending upward, looking to make the playoffs. Maybe the two teams can help each other. Montreal wants young pieces to move forward with and Vancouver needs immediate help on the back end and in goal. So Therefore I propose the following:

Markstrom
Demko
Juolevi
Virtanen
2020 1st
2019 2nd

for

Carey Price
Shea Weber

Should a rebuilding Canucks team be gutting their young depth in key positions and using high picks for two 31+ players who make about $20 mil combined for the next 8 years?

The answer is no.
 

deckercky

Registered User
Oct 27, 2010
9,379
2,452
Price for Erikkson, Sutter, Markstrom and 2019 1st (top 5 protected, or it becomes a 2020 1st)
 

Anaheim4ever

Registered User
Jun 15, 2017
8,870
5,440
They can't afford to lose out on the Hughes sweepstakes.
Canucks happen to be my favorite Canadian team, they need to do the Lose4Hughes & then get a goalie.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad