MainDotC
Depth Defenceman
I think for most fans they may be wondering why Neil didn't take more corrective action towards Cooke. EK is gone for the season, and the worst Cooke has to show for it is a facewash from Neil. I don't understand why it is acceptable for Cooke to go around ruining careers but no one ruins his career. So why didn't Neil take more severe action and risk a suspension?
I'm not sure if Neil would have gone after him, or even if Bylsma would have left him out on the ice while Neil's line was out there, other than the 1 incident. But I'm going to speculate on what MacLean said to him and tell me if you think this is in the ballpark:
MacLean, like most coaches nowadays, rarely command rash decisions (while in an emotional state which is the worst time to make decisions) or "code red's" like Isiah Thomas ordering the flagrant foul on JR Smith or the Bertuzzi incident (which I cannot find anything saying Crawford ordered the hit). I'm guessing he said something to Neil along the lines of:
"Don't do anything stupid. I don't need you taking a suspension. You're one of our core players and with Cowick, Spetsa, 9MM, and now EK out of the lineup I can't afford another regular being suspended for 10 games. We may suffer down the road but we'll suffer more if you're not there. You'll have better opportunities down the road, but you have to suck it up and wait for the lineup to get replenished."
And then again Neil is a smart guy and he's been around the league for a while so MacLean may know that he doesn't have to tell that to Neil anyway because he knows better than to potentially hurt the team more. Either way - I think SOMETHING transpired during the intermission and I wondered if that was a decent speculation.
I also saw the officials talking to Neil quite a bit in between whistles - I wonder if they were urging him to refrain from suspendable offences, especially because then they would have to deal with a more serious situation.
I'm pretty ticked that Cooke can continuously cheap shot people and no one will hit him back. I'm pretty ticked that Neil is our tough guy but he didn't take, in my opinion, more severe action on Cooke. But I'm guessing he has to hold it all in because he's afraid of Shanny coming down on him like a ton of bricks and he's actually fighting through emotional reactions for the better of the team.
Thoughts?
I'm not sure if Neil would have gone after him, or even if Bylsma would have left him out on the ice while Neil's line was out there, other than the 1 incident. But I'm going to speculate on what MacLean said to him and tell me if you think this is in the ballpark:
MacLean, like most coaches nowadays, rarely command rash decisions (while in an emotional state which is the worst time to make decisions) or "code red's" like Isiah Thomas ordering the flagrant foul on JR Smith or the Bertuzzi incident (which I cannot find anything saying Crawford ordered the hit). I'm guessing he said something to Neil along the lines of:
"Don't do anything stupid. I don't need you taking a suspension. You're one of our core players and with Cowick, Spetsa, 9MM, and now EK out of the lineup I can't afford another regular being suspended for 10 games. We may suffer down the road but we'll suffer more if you're not there. You'll have better opportunities down the road, but you have to suck it up and wait for the lineup to get replenished."
And then again Neil is a smart guy and he's been around the league for a while so MacLean may know that he doesn't have to tell that to Neil anyway because he knows better than to potentially hurt the team more. Either way - I think SOMETHING transpired during the intermission and I wondered if that was a decent speculation.
I also saw the officials talking to Neil quite a bit in between whistles - I wonder if they were urging him to refrain from suspendable offences, especially because then they would have to deal with a more serious situation.
I'm pretty ticked that Cooke can continuously cheap shot people and no one will hit him back. I'm pretty ticked that Neil is our tough guy but he didn't take, in my opinion, more severe action on Cooke. But I'm guessing he has to hold it all in because he's afraid of Shanny coming down on him like a ton of bricks and he's actually fighting through emotional reactions for the better of the team.
Thoughts?