People are short sited. They see the run Hammond went on and think he is the next big thing. We saw what happens under pressure. Anderson is a solid number 1 goalie and Lehner is a star in the making. It would be a mistake to trade either of them.
I felt like Hammond acquitted himself under pressure quite nicely once those games leading up the clinching a playoff spot started meaning something. That said, is he a proven commodity? Absolutely not. Could he be a flash in the pan? Yep. Could he be the second coming of Tim Thomas? Who knows. We just went through this with Bishop and, of course, hindsight is 20/20. He certainly didn't have his A game during the playoffs, but in his defence, the whole team looked pretty overwhelmed in those first 2 games. Chances are he reverts back closer to his AHL/career average, rather than going full-hamburglar from now on.
I do know that, while still young, Lehner hasn't done a whole lot over the past year + to impress me, but when you look at his pedigree, it still probably holds up better than Hammond's.
I don't see how you can really trade Anderson at this point, but as was pointed out, Halak got traded.
Throw Matt O'Connor into the mix and, well, let's just say I'm glad I'm not the one who has to make the decision (although I'll be surprise if he lands here). Am I comfortable with an Andy/Hammond tandem with O'Connor in the wings? ....Maybe.