WTFMAN99
Registered User
- Jun 17, 2009
- 33,066
- 11,079
Well then try to post-fix your post.
It doesn't bother me as much as it seems to bother others
Well then try to post-fix your post.
I didn't say there wouldn't be more money from endorsements, but I'm not convinced the difference would be as sizable as it's made out to be.
And, my opinion was developed based on reports I read back during Stamkos' run up to Free Agency, some of which cited tax experts. It certainly wasn't unfair to think they would be accurate before being shown anything contradictory. No offense meant, but I had no reason to just take your word for it.
Opinions are fluid. With this now I can change mine.
FWIW though, seems pretty unclear from the wikipedia IMO how much this jock tax actually amounts to as it doesn't seem to be % based, but an arbitrary figure. Very weird.
You sir are an HF unicorn. People that change their opinions based on new facts are soooo rare here so hats of to you for that.
As for the rate it varies state by state. They simply apply their rate to the tax bracket for their state applied to the number of games in that state.
I appreciate the opportunity to learn something new
The answer to the question is trading for Calle Jarkrok.
2million dollar centre locked up for another 4 years who is great as a shot suppressor.
Could use a C who is more defensive minded who is no slouch offensively.
Id be willing to give up a good wing prospect+ to make it happen.
Yup, he is a 3W because they have Johansen, Bonino Turris 1-2-3.Nashville fans (not that they have any say) have said that he's not available, and isn't he playing more wing then centre these days?
Yup, he is a 3W because they have Johansen, Bonino Turris 1-2-3.
Its one of the reasons I think he is attainable because he is now a C/W. Id love to see him between a Komarov and Marleau for the rest of the year, and when Komarov and Marleau are gone Hyman/Brown/Grundstrom/Leivo.