I can't see Stone not being in the line-up if he shows at least like he did last year. Looked like a quality NHL player with a ton of room to grow. If he does continue to grow, we can spread the scoring and have 3 scoring lines :
MacArthur-Turris-Stone (MacTurris* combo is the key, Stone hockey IQ and vision only makes it better)
Michalek-Zibanejad-Ryan (could give us a rejuvenated Michalek and help Zbad breakout)
Chiasson-Legwand-Lazar (Legwand would help both youngers to cement themselves as good NHL players)
Hoffman/Greening-Smith-Neil
Condra is the odd man out, Greening too if we can move him.
Calls-ups : Pageau, Grant, Schneider, Puempel, Prince, Guptill, Dzingel
LOTS of options
1st PP : MacArthur-Turris-Ryan
2nd PP : Michalek/Legwand-Zibanejad-Stone/Chiasson/Lazar
A lot of good hockey players will have to fight for ice-time. The team is much more deeper than last year. We lost Spezza (and Conacher + Kassian) yes but we added Stone, Legwand, Chiasson and Lazar/Hoffman. And it might not be over as Condra and Greening might be out as well to make room for younger players.
* We should use this going forward lol
Having guys like fisher at 3c for so long, and havlat at 3rw for long has probably raised my standards, but I never considered Neil a great third liner.
In Neils prime he was our 4th line right winger behind alfredsson,hossa, and havlat. Then he got worse and worse while moving up the lineup. Of course there's bitterness.
If he was on our 4th line then, and this past year was 3rd line while being a quarter of his primes effectiveness, what the hell are we doing with this organization?
I see that some people easily say that but then I look at facts and see that Chris Neil was 13th in TOI/G among forwards
http://www.nhl.com/ice/playerstats.htm?fetchKey=20142OTTFAFALL&sort=avgTOIPerGame&viewName=timeOnIce
Hemsky, Stone and Hoffman only played 20-25 games each and Conacher is gone... So, Hemsky replaced Conacher and both had more TOI/G.
The ONLY regular forward who had LESS TOI/G than Chris Neil was Erik Condra
Other forwards who had less TOI/G are :
Matt Kassian, Derek Grant, JG Pageau, Stephane Da Costa...
All depth rookies and an enforcer who is well below NHL average in skating
Going forward, we subtracted Spezza but added Legwand and Chiasson who should both see more TOI/G than Neil. Stone, Lazar and Hoffman could all be on this (at least 2 of the 3 IMO) and will most likely see more TOI/G than Neil
Still worried?
Reality is there is no place anymore for
both Neil and Condra. One will be moved and it will most likely be Condra (99% sure)
Note : In Neil's prime (2005-06 & 2006-07), he was easily a 3rd liner. We're talking about a 12-15 goals / 30 points player with only 12 of TOI/G. He scored 8 PP goals in 2005-06 (more than Spezza, Havlat, Vermette, etc. Was 3rd on the team)
It's not going to get any better next year either. We'll have Pageau, Lazar, Hoffman, Stone and peumps fighting for spots, and only Condra's spot opening up.
Condra, Greening, Smith and Neil should all be watching their backs, me thinks.
Yep, Condra and Greening first. Smith and Neil (2 more years) will probably kept for the sandpaper they bring. The organization want guys who play "hard hockey", and if someone thinks that Neil doesn't, he needs to watch hockey another thousand games to understand the game a little bit more.
EDIT : Neil's TOI/G last year was 11:48. Let's drop it another 2 minutes, and have him as the 12th/13th forward.
Neil TOI/G :
2013-14 : 11:48
2012-13 : 13:51
2011-12 : 12:47
2010-11 : 12:45
2009-10 : 11:58
2008-09 : 10:58
2007-08 : 12:45
2006-07 : 13:07
2005-06 : 12:18
Since the lock-out, plays about 12 mins per game. That's 4th line ice-time, quality 4th liner though and what he has been MOST of his career.
Note that he played more in 2012-13, but guess why? Injuries.