SuperScript29
Registered User
- Nov 17, 2017
- 2,141
- 1,755
Zadina for Werenski?
It's a nice thought, but to get a player like Werenski you'd have to at least part with one of Larkin or Mantha.
Zadina for Werenski?
If this were true, which I doubt, we should do Mantha without blinking. Keeping a winger instead of filling that gaping hole at LD would be a terrible idea.It's a nice thought, but to get a player like Werenski you'd have to at least part with one of Larkin or Mantha.
Agreed with signing him as a ufa , zero interest in krug and the deal it would takeJust sign Werenski as UFA, when he gets UFA. Like Krug at next summer.
No reason to lose assets in a trade. He'll join Larkin one day.
I don't expect a trade, but it could be something like
Zadina + Kaski + 2nd.
Our lottery 1st is just too valuable. Different game if it's contender 1st at ~25 overall range.
If this were true, which I doubt, we should do Mantha without blinking. Keeping a winger instead of filling that gaping hole at LD would be a terrible idea.
And cbj would have zero interest in a 24 yr old kaski
These will be great additions to our signing of Trouba last summerJust sign Werenski as UFA, when he gets UFA. Like Krug at next summer.
Their interest is most likely focused in good hockey players.They have alot of interest for RhDs, because they won't have them more than 2.
These will be great additions to our signing of Trouba last summer
The point is to wait until we have a good foundation before we start shipping assets out for a player that will only move us 3 or 4 spots up the standings at best. This is just as valid now as it was when we hopped trouba might make it to UFA.
Not in a undrafted 24 yr old with zero nhl games to his resume who might be back in europe next seasonThey have alot of interest for RhDs, because they won't have them more than 2.
How can we be sure that Werenski's development isn't being taxed by carrying such a big burden so early in CBJ? He's put some serious mileage in for a young guy, and looked to be playing through something severe in the playoffs last year.
I wouldn't trust a proposal or appraisal that wasn't heavy on evaluating the present instead of pedigree. A hypothetical proposal for a "cornerstone d-man" is one thing, but there needs to be uncertainty accounted for as to whether Werenski will sustain that billing for over a decade. It's easy to rate another teams players like they exist in a vacuum/simulation, but time and entropy are m-fers.
Yeah, we need to draw a distinction between pre and post-injury Werenski. He was really, really good before that injury. After it... good, but not what he was. This year, 7 points in 17 games. He's not one-dimensional, but he's definitely a guy who makes his money by contributing offensively. And he's having a tough time so far.
Also, I'm totally convinced Mantha will calm down pretty soon here. He's always been streaky. We need to recognize that he's way above the curve right now, and will regress to his mean pretty soon here. So the "Mantha is indispensible!" people are going to feel silly.
Their interest is most likely focused in good hockey players.
Zadina for Werenski?
Larkin and 1st round picks should be the only things not on the table for Werenski, he solves so many problems on the blue line.
Werenski-Hronek
Cholowski-Seider
That looks amazing to me, best case Ontario Werenski specifically asks for a trade to Detroit.
yeah, that's the one that immediately came to my mind, as well. I think they are more of a Rasmussen team, though.
I think they want Mantha, but if a deal is to be made it'll be Athanasiou.
I would offer them AA, Cholo and maybe another decent asset without a second of hesitation.
Yeah, I'd definitely be up for that depending on what that last asset is. I wouldn't be giving up an unprotected 1st, and I think Larkin is off the table for me. As I allude to above, I think a lot depends on where Columbus sees themselves with the group of players they have. If they think the group they have is close, they are going to be looking to add pieces to help them now which can help the add to the appeal of a guy like Athanasiou and, to a lesser extent, Cholowski. Along with some vets who we could retain salary on and be used as secondary pieces.
If they are looking to do a mini-rebuild, though, then picks/prospects could be more alluring. Maybe Columbus is going to look at selling a number of pieces off.
Yeah I am not doing an unprotected lottery first in either of the next two years. Wasn't sure what to go with for the next asset. If we swing this because of his cap control on the three year deal we could also really big game hunt on Taylor Hall this off-season if we choose to. Werenski's next contract would come after we have blood let some of the deals.
Just think this a deal that makes sense and not just because he is from Michigan, he is a really good hockey player and I think he is a big core piece.