Ken Holland cap space management specialty.
Do you have pause even for a moment to deduce what others are talking about? The conversation was about HDSC metric being inaccurate. Thats the discussion that was occurring. In general terms. I didn't see the discussion being around Cult of hockey until YOU brought it up, lolYes...of course hockey is difficult to quantify by numbers. Thats not exactly ground breaking info.
That does not mean that there is no point in refining some data generating systems that are helpful.
The point of my post was that the HDSC metric (as it is being calculated on NST) is not accurate enough. The Cult of Hockey interpretation is more accurate based on my own viewings of the games.
So yes...I agree with your comment that the Cult of Hockey metric is a better tool.
I am simply bringing to light a website that many posters currently use as a source and how their current standards of criteria isnt accurate enough.
If you want to start a conversation about how hockey is too complex to bother with any of this (or how Cult of Hockey isnt worth watching) you can do that but thats not at all what I am trying to generate conversation about.
agree, so they need to figure out a way to simplify it to play to their strength.......They tried the hybrid MVM system last year but Vegas exploited the Oilers tendencies to break down while executing it.
Honestly I think we have a large group of offensively talented key players and defenders but who are incapable of playing high level defensive systems play at NHL speed.
I’m pretty sick of Erne. It’s pretty clear he brings nothing.
Ken Holland cap space management specialty.
agree, so they need to figure out a way to simplify it to play to their strength.......
unfortunately that requires a .92% goalie behind them
What does that even mean? Are you insinuating that there is a portion of the fanbase that controls the Oilers performance like pulling the strings on a puppet? Wow, if that's the case, we should all get together and plead with them to make the Oilers more successful.it’s oNLy gAmE OnE
it’s oNLy gAmE TwO
it’s oNLy gAmE tHrEe
it’s oNLy gAmE FoUr
it’s oNLy gAmE fIVe
it’s oNLy gAmE sIX
the only thing worse than the oilers are the portion of the fanbase that allow this bullshit
Vegas, Colorado, Boston are 6-0-0
Bingo. A good coach (in my opinion) doesn’t try to ram square pegs into round holes but plays to a teams strengths — but every team has deficiencies.
Ours is goaltending at the moment and no system survives poor goaltending. In order to play a high tempo upgunned transition game which starts with ( good neutral zone play ) you must must must have a bail out goalie.
We don’t have that ergo we’re caught behind the proverbial rock and a hard place with how the boys are collectively wired to play and how (insert coach here) wants them to play and they don’t have a goaltending safety net.
This is also true.Not blaming Woody, time for the men to be men and do their jobs
Then, bring on the next set of contestants, who will be working with the same pieces of shyte! Rinse and repeat, baby.Sadly I’m not that upset, not enraged, just numb. Worst defensive team in the league. It was embarrassing watching the continuous tire fire in our own zone. Losses to Rags and Flames and I suspect Woody and Manson are done.
Your boy Woody will only get fired when you say so. How close are you to dropping the hammer?Losses don’t lie.
Unfortunately, you need cap room for that. We barely squeezed Ryan McLeod on the team this year. As it is, we are already short one body on the active roster.I was told this team needed no additions this offseason.
How many did it take tip again? 10 straight?Even if they lose the next two games I don't think Woodcroft will be fired. Holland is slow moving and will wait until it's almost too late or too late. Also there's the built-in excuse of no-McDavid.
That is how atrocious the cap management has been. They cannot even call up anyone without resorting to some sort of emergency usage. How the f*** that asshole GM still has a job, at a premium rate no less, is mind boggling.
What does that even mean? Are you insinuating that there is a portion of the fanbase that controls the Oilers performance like pulling the strings on a puppet? Wow, if that's the case, we should all get together and plead with them to make the Oilers more successful.
How many did it take tip again? 10 straight?
What I saw you doing (what you do on occasion) is redirect the conversation.Do you have pause even for a moment to deduce what others are talking about? The conversation was about HDSC metric being inaccurate. Thats the discussion that was occurring. In general terms. I didn't see the discussion being around Cult of hockey until YOU brought it up, lol
In fairness applies to both of us. lolWhat I saw you doing (what you do on occasion) is redirect the conversation.
I didnt want the conversation to be about Cult of Hockey. Just used that as an example of how the HDSC criteria they used was more accurate than what Natural Stat Trick was doing.
You were the one who decided infuse your opinion of CofH and how what they did was of little or no value. You made it about C of H.
Make sense?
Conversations with you are more effort than they need to be sometimes...lol
You're missing the point though! He's a good veteran that you know will bring nothing. That's way better than a young guy that might bring something or nothing.I’m pretty sick of Erne. It’s pretty clear he brings nothing.
Believing that analytics of any kind poorly quantifies hockey is is fine but why then enter into a conversation about improving something you dont even believe in?In fairness applies to both of us. lol
Its harder to see our own parts. I'm sure as you say HDSC is a better metric. but you can probably understand that because I believe anayltics of any kind poorly quantify hockey my resolute opinion are they are limited. Perhaps getting better. I'll take a look sometime if bored.
Right now I'm making good soup with a bunch of stuff I was still able to haul out of garden before the frosts hit. I enjoy doing that more than perusing analytics. heh. I have a statistical background but never liked the courses.
People that don't believe in Religion discuss the same or interject. Or politics or economy, or philosophy etc. You get my point. Humans are fairly prone to discuss any and all things. I'm reminded of the couple sitting in the Restaurant in a Monty Python skit with Philosophy discussion menus. hehBelieving that analytics of any kind poorly quantifies hockey is is fine but why then enter into a conversation about improving something you dont even believe in?
Thats exactly what I mean about redirecting a conversation.
In any event...yes...it is harder to see our own parts. Maybe we can agree on that.
What if we waived Erne?
I mean at this point I'd take Britney Spears as goaltending coach, any live human being at least has some statistical probability of being better than Schwartz, lulz.
Maybe her doing a dance class with the goalies may actually be more beneficial than whatever the f*** Schwartz is doing.