bluesfan94
Registered User
Case closed
This doesn't close the case. I mean, it does in the sense that nothing is going to change, but obviously the NHL was going to say this given the decision. The question is whether they are correct
Case closed
You don’t actually think Landeskog, after being eliminated in a game 7, is wasting his time staring at pixels on an iPad to determine if he was offside or not, do you?!?He just admited it was his own fault, I'll take his word.
thats a pretty poor argument because they were on the ice, Pavelski wasnt for a while. What, San Jose didnt have guys playing injured too?If we're gonna use the "if" then IF Landeskog and Rantanen (both rushed to play IMO) were healthy maybe it would've gone to 7 games or Avs would've won. Losing Calvert also hurt the team.
You don’t actually think Landeskog, after being eliminated in a game 7, is wasting his time staring at pixels on an iPad to determine if he was offside or not, do you?!?
He’s relying on the refs decision.
Has it been like that the entire time because the way they've always called it is that both skates have to contact the blue line for linesmen to call it clear for tag-up. And if that's the case, all the players that do the tag up take poor paths to clear the zone in such instances because if it's just one skate that has to clear they don't have to skate as high as practically all of them do.
This, and presumable the ability to use both or multiple cameras on multiple better screens at the same time, synced up time-wiseIt was the NHLs decision.
They have better cameras than we will ever see.
Whats he suppose to say?He just admited it was his own fault, I'll take his word.
Refs fix Game 7 vs VGK
"they won't do it again"
Refs fix Game 7 vs COL
"they won't do it again"
I'll take those odds buddy....... because I bet they will
Using ifs are already poor arguments so I guess yeah my argument is poor.thats a pretty poor argument because they were on the ice, Pavelski wasnt for a while. What, San Jose didnt have guys playing injured too?
Whats he suppose to say?
Is this actually true? If so, they would be wise to release a stillIt was the NHLs decision.
They have better cameras than we will ever see.
Is this actually true? If so, they would be wise to release a still
That's a circular argument.Didn't you whine about an official NHL explanation?
there it is, he didn't tag up, thus it's a good call.
cya next round with all that built up salt.
You would think in 2019, the NHL would figure out a way to be able to show the public these superb camera shots.It was the NHLs decision.
They have better cameras than we will ever see.
I mean, multiple cameras in sync isn't that impressive. NBC could do that. Do they actually have better angles/cameras or are you just saying that? Some support would be niceThey've always had better cameras, they don't use the **** NBC/SN uses.
They have multiple cameras in sync like another poster said
I have yet to see a CONCLUSIVE image of him not tagging up.Didn't you whine about an official NHL explanation?
there it is, he didn't tag up, thus it's a good call.
cya next round with all that built up salt.
Gabe is a professional. He would own it regardless of who's fault it was, thats why he has the Che could've *****ed about the refs like gallant and the whiny knight squad did.
We have 36m in cap space aswell lolyeah you guys are going to crush...just need a tad more depth scoring which you can easily get with those draft picks. Those clutch ELC's can win a cup
Gabe is a professional. He would own it regardless of who's fault it was, thats why he has the C
In any case... if they had too many men that wasn’t called... doesn’t it sort of even out? I mean, were they really jobbed ultimately ?
IF that wasn’t offside.
They lost fair and square. And the Avs got multiple HUGE breaks from the refs late in game 6.
The sharks got screwed game 6 of round one, after 1mil obvious calls, including much obstruction, were ignored... then suddenly they’re calling a weak slash in OT2. Did the sharks collapse? They scored a shorty.
Props to the Avs, I agree they handled the situation far, FAR better than Vegas did. The Avs easily could have tied it still.
The problem is that you haven't given anything. You're saying the NHL saying the NHL is right proves that the NHL is right. The question we're trying to decide is whether the NHL is right. You're saying the NHL has better cameras, without even providing proof of that, or of a still/video from those cameras.That dude's been complaining at every GDT since the Vegas series about the refs.
He asks for ****, we give it to him, but he just chucks it out the door and continues his nonsense.