scliff
Registered User
- Nov 28, 2009
- 166
- 59
Yes, how does a puck start moving in a different direction if nothing touches it?Any actual rebuttal to this? Watch the replay again.
Yes, how does a puck start moving in a different direction if nothing touches it?Any actual rebuttal to this? Watch the replay again.
no call lmao
That’s incorrect. Video evidence shows that the puck went from rotating on its horizontal axis to its vertical axis on its way down, while the speed of rotation also changed.
That’s incorrect. Video evidence shows that the puck went from rotating on its horizontal axis to its vertical axis on its way down, while the speed of rotation also changed.
provided that.......Hahahahah you didn't Include the fule rule hahahahha how comical. Read the full rule it's clear as day
I didnt see LA players doing that, or anything else as blatant.
It wasnt the prettiest game and I can appreciate how frustrating it is to lose a game where you feel like your team dominates, but this ref blaming is getting a bit silly.
All these amateur physicists with the high stick check. It went to the war room and they didnt overturn it, what are you moaning about?
Edmonton play with the razzle dazzle but if they cant keep the discipline in check it is going to cost them.
no call lmao
That is your own personal, subjective opinion on the matter - I haven't looked but I'm sure the rulebook doesn't define "batting to an opponent". This means it's a ruling that is wide open to interpretation. And in such situations, the league generally lets the ruling on the ice stand.Which did not happen on this play.
We'll figure out that whole grassy knoll fiasco before we figure out of the puck was touched or
Apparently gravity can make things move in a different horizontal direction and even change the rotation axis of the puck lolYes, how does a puck start moving in a different direction if nothing touches it?
LOL. Apparently you haven't heard of gravity.
weird...Nuge did the same and got called for a penalty (top right)Meh, I feel like that should be let go. It seems to me Danault mostly got stick there.
You'd think getting swept by the Avs would've humbled them after they had an easy run to the WCF, but here we areThe arrogance coming from oil country is abhorrent.
Acting like it’s completely impossible that the greatest team on planet earth is simply not finishing on a duly earned win from puck drop.
Yes, how does a puck start moving in a different direction if nothing touches it?
Felt like L.A. was stuck in their own zone most of the game.Edmonton is the most mentally fragile team in the history of professional sports. Every call is a conspiracy. Hilarious. The Kings aren’t even that good.
I inserted a image of the full ruleprovided that.......
Where is the rest?
Mmmmmm sushiWho cares! Can we talk more about how a scrub like Danault is allowed to 2 hand slash a super star and all 4 guys on the ice pretend they sushi see anything
It’s not rocket science though. As someone else said, some things can be “conclusive” without being “obvious”, as should have been the case here.NHL referees aren't working for NASA. If you got to start pulling out a protractor while watching it in super slow motion, it's not conclusive.
The refs haven’t evened out anything. You guys have a massive advantage in PP minutes including two in overtime. Also we have an Ot game winner called back while yours stood on a similarly sketchy play. Nothing about the refs this series is evened up.Yeah I thought the Drai call was a bit harsh at the time, but that was about the only one that stood out to me. perhaps the refs were kind of evening up the doughty interference call before he got roughed by nurse
That's best in the universe to you, pal!You can’t have no name guys like Danault taking 2 hand wacks at super stars and refs turning a blind eye!