WCQF GM3 | LA Kings vs Edmonton Oilers @7:00pm PT (Series tied 1-1) | TNT, CBC, SN

Status
Not open for further replies.

Divine

Registered User
Dec 18, 2010
18,604
12,451
It’s not rocket science though. As someone else said, some things can be “conclusive” without being “obvious”, as should have been the case here.

It's not conclusive nor obvious.

Conclusive or obvious would be if he actually hit the puck with *any* force resulting in the puck not coming straight down and obviously moving.

The fact people are arguing that he tapped it so lightly that the trajectory didn't change but the spin *might* have changed is very inconclusive.

It would be very difficult for any of us to throw a puck in the air and touch it with our stick without changing it's trajectory. That's what makes it inconclusive.

Now if you pull out a scientific calculator, a protractor and super slow motion, and get a team of mathematicians and physicists, I'm sure they can conclusive say if there was an external force on the rotation of the puck... but, it's inconclusive if you have to go to those lengths to prove something.

To Woodcroft's argument of McDavid raising his hand, that's the most ridiculous part of all of this. The opposing team almost always raises it's hand on any close call, like all those time the puck goes to the blue line and the opposing team raises it's hand saying it went out when it never does.
 

Kairi Zaide

Unforgiven
Aug 11, 2009
104,901
12,291
Quebec City
weird...Nuge did the same and got called for a penalty (top right)

The two plays you are comparing are very similar plays. However, one results in a broken stick; the other doesn't. I think in intent, both action could be seen as "trying to play the puck", because the puck was in the viscinity. However, slashes that result in a broken stick are called almost all the time, regardless of that.
 

Korpse

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Feb 5, 2010
20,776
9,615
Did McDavid use the force to cause that change? Was there another object that contacted the puck to cause that change?


Literally the only other object in the vicinity of the puck to cause the change was the stick of the LA kings player lol.

Not an object, rather a force called gravity.

Gravity can change the rotation. The rate of rotation will slow as the puck reaches its peak and once gravity takes over it is now under a different force. There’s not a person in here that is able to tell us what that rotation should look like after it starts to fall.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad