Siamese Dream
Registered User
The theory is irrelevant? A theory that has been used by thousands of hockey people around the world for many years is irrelevant? I can't tell if you're serious or just disagreeing for the sake of disagreeing. And again I'm not comparing, it's a ****ing example of a team giving a young player ice time so he has some experience playing international hockey, so when he's thrown into a key role later on, he knows what to expect.
I'm the one baffled by your inability to comprehend the theory and the fact that I've said 100 times in multiple conversations that I understand that Canada and GB are in 2 totally different situations but theories in player development don't change in these situations, regardless of what jersey you're wearing. Giving a player some experience in a situation that he'll be relied to perform in in the near future is obvious you don't wait until he's the only guy left then throw him into a tournament where you expect him to perform despite his complete lack of experience. And hey, remember when I said these tournament setups are broken and should have a playoff after the round robin? Well if they did that, they'd have no problem giving him a game in the round robin, or should they not do that because that's something that other countries would do?
It is irrelevant to us in this situation.
It would be relevant if we were playing in a small round robin tournament during one of the international breaks but this is the pinnacle of international competition for us. We aren't going to risk putting in a young goalie when we have a better one.