Forgive me if your question came off as sarcasm.
Either way... you have your answer. In hockey, sometimes that kind of thing happens. If Nash wasn't on the scoresheet in any way, I'd be right there with you. But he's finding ways to help the team on the scoresheet despite not being the goalscorer. His offensive output is exactly 50% higher compared to last year's playoffs. Last night he didn't get on the scoresheet, but he still looked very good for the majority of the game.
By the way, I'm a believer in redemption. Kreider might not have had a good game until he scored, but I don't really care about that. To me, he had a good game... because he scored a big goal.