bluedevil58*
Guest
We had a better record under Muller. Why is everyone so high on Peters? Look at our record. Look at your star players production. We have officially been eliminated from playoff contention. What say you?
Discuss!
Discuss!
Everybody liked Maurice and Muller and Maurice at the beginning too. And Laviolette. Give it time...
1.) Things feel palpably better with Peters (and Francis) than under Maurice or Lavy or Maurice (part 2) or Muller and Rutherford. Different...like there's an organizational philosophy and a plan at work. A roadmap rather than short-sightedness.
2.) That said...I expect that if Peters can't make it work by mid-season of next year with guys like Semin and Skinner that haven't yet clicked here under him...he's going to be fired. You can't stick with a coach that can't make it work with the best players you have (and can't move except at a loss of value) and won't adapt to do so. Organizational accountability and roadmaps are nice...but the plans have to fit the tools in the toolbox.
Blue, it's across the board lack of production from our core players aside from Faulk. How do our stars simply turn it off? Did the team have some sort of gentlemen's agreement to waive this season good bye? This is a lack of production system wide.
I hope to God they don't fire Peters. This organization goes through coaches so quickly, it's no wonder they haven't had any sustained success.
At some point, they've got to stick with a coach and tell the players to nut up and deal with it. Peters has to be that coach.