Okay bud. This isn't the Useless Thread. Take it to the Lounge.When weed is processed by the liver it actually makes something called 11 hydroxy metabolite which is 5X more psychoactive than THC
Okay bud. This isn't the Useless Thread. Take it to the Lounge.When weed is processed by the liver it actually makes something called 11 hydroxy metabolite which is 5X more psychoactive than THC
Joke was more will this guy fill the hole in my heart when we traded Brannwagon awayThis is more like a McNabb. Defensive defenseman.
Just so long as he isn't like Holden.... a defenseman????This is more like a McNabb. Defensive defenseman.
Just so long as he isn't like Holden.... a defenseman????
This is more like a McNabb. Defensive defenseman.
PMD? Post Meridian Defenseman.... so afternoon defensemanHe's way more of a PMD than McNabb will ever be.
PMD? Post Meridian Defenseman.... so afternoon defenseman
PMD? Post Meridian Defenseman.... so afternoon defenseman
puck moving defensman.
And I would hope he's far better at it than McNabb, but that's what McNabb is supposed to be.
35 points in 39 games. I'd say he will be.
Players don't become two time Hobey Baker finalists with poor puck handling. I'm not suggesting he'll be as good as Theodore and Schmidt at it but it's not unreasonable to think he's likely to be better than McNabb, Merrill, and Holden in that regard.You never know until they're out there against NHL competition night in and night out.
If he can hold the puck at the blue line more than 5 times a season he tops millerPlayers don't become two time Hobey Baker finalists with poor puck handling. I'm not suggesting he'll be as good as Theodore and Schmidt at it but it's not unreasonable to think he's likely to be better than McNabb, Merrill, and Holden in that regard.
Players don't become two time Hobey Baker finalists with poor puck handling. I'm not suggesting he'll be as good as Theodore and Schmidt at it but it's not unreasonable to think he's likely to be better than McNabb, Merrill, and Holden in that regard.
Like are you trying to be obtuse? Or what?So then NHL flops are just a myth.....
Gusev is probably gonna ask for more money than Smith and Marchy get.Was he the top rated free agent available?
And Gusev the top rated player not in the NHL?
This team could be better even with losing Eakin and Smith/Marchessault. Who would both return value.
Like are you trying to be obtuse? Or what?
I didn't say he was definitely going to be an NHL stud. Or even an NHL player. You can have an elite attribute or even several and not have a totality of attributes enough for the NHL. Marc Andre Bergeron had a better slap shot than I'd say 90% of NHL defensemen when he was playing but he was horrible at just about everything else so he never had much of a career. Jiri Sekac had near elite puck handling and well above average passing but he had next to zero hockey IQ and was never effective on the ice. Emerson Etem at top speed was one of the fastest skaters in the NHL but he was terrible defensively, had offensive tunnel vision and had no finish. Pirri has a better shot than most players in the NHL but clearly he's struggled to stick in the NHL. Ditto for Leipsic. Excellent speed, good hands, zero finish or playmaking sense.
I can go on and on but the point is being better than other players at one area of the game is not dispositive of being a stud or even regular NHL player. So you can chill with the facetiousness.
Gusev is probably gonna ask for more money than Smith and Marchy get.
Well then maybe pay attention to what I'm saying. I didn't say he'd be better than any of those players I said he'd likely be better at one aspect of the game based on his numbers, reputation, and being a Hobey Baker finalist twice.Not being obtuse. Just dont want to count unhatched chickens.