idontusethisanymore
This is joshprost99
- Apr 6, 2016
- 1,169
- 923
Golden Knights purchase AHL franchise, Wolves owner confident team will find new NHL partnershipOf the entire Blues cup winning roster, Chicago Wolves alumni were a minority of the roster. Only a handful of players like Binnington, Dunn, and Barbashyov spent a respectable amount of time in Rosemont. Parayko (half a season after finishing college) and most of the claimed alumni ever played less than a full season total for the Wolves. Most of the big names on the cup winning roster were free agent and trade acquisitions, and most of the younger players spent much more time in San Antonio than Chicago. Not nearly enough to repair the damage with most of the comments and potshots that were called a few years ago. It was a bad marriage that ended badly.
But unless St. Louis manages to find an owner willing to sell their AHL franchise, which Vegas showed is incredibly unlikely, they won't have much of a choice. They'll both need to swallow their pride.
The ideal partners for the wolves are running out other than the blues the only other contracts that are up are Hershey/Washington and maybe Springfield/Florida both are incredibly unlikely not to renew.Now the Wolves must find another NHL franchise to partner with. They could go back to the St. Louis Blues, whose AHL affiliate is San Antonio, but Levin said he has no interest in rekindling that relationship
He probably think's Sin Bin Fuel is a verified source instead of a account of a high school age beat writer.Well, that settles it, then. How could anyone question the validity of a Tweet describing the STL Blues' tire kicking activities from "the recognized authority on LA Kings prospects"?
Some of the most skilled & respected journalists of our time - and a number of us HFB posters - attended secondary school at one time or another.He probably think's Sin Bin Fuel is a verified source instead of a account of a high school age beat writer.
To be fair guys, John Hoven is pretty connected (also a member of the PHWA). I get the skepticism being that its coming from a LA Kings beat writer but I wouldn't immediately just toss it off either. We all know the difficulties surrounding entrance as an AHL Club, the ECHL exit fee, etc but given the last time Chicago and the Blues partnered maybe going this route is more preferable and worth it.
Just sayin', where's there's smoke doesn't always mean its a raging fire but still worth attending to.
I thought you went to incendiary school for rocket scientists.I only attended a firstendary school.....
A lot has changed for the Blues. They may be more willing and able to help with things they weren’t last time.Blues were kicking the tires in Indianapolis in 2017. They couldn't convince the Indy Fuel ownership to do what Colorado Eagles ended up doing: paying to join the AHL, paying the ECHL exit fee, upgrading the facility and infrastructure to meet AHL standards, with almost no help from the parent team. They apparently told the Blues to get lost so quickly that the Blues shifted all of their efforts to trying the same thing with Lamar Hunt Jr. in Kansas City. That was only a few years ago, I can't imagine that much has changed.
A lot has changed for the Blues. They may be more willing and able to help with things they weren’t last time.
The only leverage Levin can have is if a NHL team other than STL came to him and said they would like to have their prospects in Rosemont otherwise it’s almost certainly going to be the blues affiliated with the wolves again. There is no perfect solution even if STL buys a team like Syracuse or Springfield with a offer they can’t refuse.Florida or Tampa probably won’t be to thrilled with having their prospects in another time zone.I don't know if this article means anything - Commentary: Without AHL affiliate, could Blues' eyes be on Kansas City?
It points out that St Louis may have more money after their Cup win.
Something else I haven't seen anyone ask. It seems clear that the Wolves and the Blues would be the most obvious match, but neither the Blues or the Wolves appear eager to get back together. But if I recall correctly, the Blues don't technically need an affiliate; they went without one before. It's the Wolves that need an affiliate. What's to stop the Blues from playing hardball and saying "This time, you play our prospects, you follow our system, or else?" And if the Blues do this, what's to stop Don Levin from thinking, "If I can't run the Wolves I want to run them, why do this?" and just getting out? He's never directly said he's lost money every year, but he's made it pretty clear he does this for pleasure, and if he can't do it the way he wants, I'd see his point.
Pure speculation by Mr. Ponder. He could win HFB Poster of the Day award with that kinda material.I don't know if this article means anything - Commentary: Without AHL affiliate, could Blues' eyes be on Kansas City?
It points out that St Louis may have more money after their Cup win. ...
I don't know if this article means anything - Commentary: Without AHL affiliate, could Blues' eyes be on Kansas City?
It points out that St Louis may have more money after their Cup win.
Something else I haven't seen anyone ask. It seems clear that the Wolves and the Blues would be the most obvious match, but neither the Blues or the Wolves appear eager to get back together. But if I recall correctly, the Blues don't technically need an affiliate; they went without one before. It's the Wolves that need an affiliate. What's to stop the Blues from playing hardball and saying "This time, you play our prospects, you follow our system, or else?" And if the Blues do this, what's to stop Don Levin from thinking, "If I can't run the Wolves I want to run them, why do this?" and just getting out? He's never directly said he's lost money every year, but he's made it pretty clear he does this for pleasure, and if he can't do it the way he wants, I'd see his point.
The only leverage Levin can have is if a NHL team other than STL came to him and said they would like to have their prospects in Rosemont otherwise it’s almost certainly going to be the blues affiliated with the wolves again. There is no perfect solution even if STL buys a team like Syracuse or Springfield with a offer they can’t refuse.Florida or Tampa probably won’t be to thrilled with having their prospects in another time zone.
I don't know if this article means anything - Commentary: Without AHL affiliate, could Blues' eyes be on Kansas City?
It points out that St Louis may have more money after their Cup win.
Something else I haven't seen anyone ask. It seems clear that the Wolves and the Blues would be the most obvious match, but neither the Blues or the Wolves appear eager to get back together. But if I recall correctly, the Blues don't technically need an affiliate; they went without one before. It's the Wolves that need an affiliate. What's to stop the Blues from playing hardball and saying "This time, you play our prospects, you follow our system, or else?" And if the Blues do this, what's to stop Don Levin from thinking, "If I can't run the Wolves I want to run them, why do this?" and just getting out? He's never directly said he's lost money every year, but he's made it pretty clear he does this for pleasure, and if he can't do it the way he wants, I'd see his point.
Usually just two - All Star and summer.
Guessing this approval will be happening in another form.
I don't know if this article means anything - Commentary: Without AHL affiliate, could Blues' eyes be on Kansas City?
It points out that St Louis may have more money after their Cup win.
Something else I haven't seen anyone ask. It seems clear that the Wolves and the Blues would be the most obvious match, but neither the Blues or the Wolves appear eager to get back together. But if I recall correctly, the Blues don't technically need an affiliate; they went without one before. It's the Wolves that need an affiliate. What's to stop the Blues from playing hardball and saying "This time, you play our prospects, you follow our system, or else?" And if the Blues do this, what's to stop Don Levin from thinking, "If I can't run the Wolves I want to run them, why do this?" and just getting out? He's never directly said he's lost money every year, but he's made it pretty clear he does this for pleasure, and if he can't do it the way he wants, I'd see his point.
The NHL team just experienced a huge financial windfall in winning the Cup. Look at the season ticket situation for a more tangible sign. The financial burden of owning the AHL team or need for defraying some additional costs may not look as onerous. The ownership group has demonstrated a willingness to spend on things like the new practice facility. So, yes I think it’s reasonable to suppose their decision matrix around the AHL options may have broadened.Not sure what you're referring to, there haven't been too many changes for the Blues. Their prospect development strategy hasn't changed, there haven't been many changes within the organization. They had two opportunities to buy AHL franchises, and they let both of them by the wayside. They were perfectly happy to keep the kids on the farm in San Antonio until Vegas pulled the rug out from under them. I actually can't even think of any indicators showing them changing their attitude towards the prospect development path at all.