Leafsmann
Registered User
- Jan 4, 2016
- 518
- 236
That pickard trade looks even weirder now.
Will probably call up Dansk and have him back-up Subban.
Better off keeping Pickard.Will probably call up Dansk and have him back-up Subban.
That pickard trade looks even weirder now.
Better off keeping Pickard.
You can't loan players to other NHL teamsthe leafs will loan then pickard, not trade, loan. besides its not a big deal for vegas, they aren't meant to be competitive this year anyways. giving their potential goalie of the future some starts isn't the worst thing in the world
That pickard trade looks even weirder now.
It makes perfect sense to me. A thinly veiled attempt at tanking by George Mcphee in my opinion.
McPhee passes on guys like Raanta, Mzarek and Grubauer, ultimately deciding on Fluery and Pickard as his goaltending tandem. Maybe he came to the conclusion that the duo of Fleury/Pickard would win too many games so he dumped Pickard for Subban.
It makes perfect sense to me. A thinly veiled attempt at tanking by George Mcphee in my opinion.
McPhee passes on guys like Raanta, Mrazek and Grubauer, ultimately deciding on Fluery and Pickard as his goaltending tandem. Maybe he came to the conclusion that the duo of Fleury/Pickard would win too many games so he dumped Pickard for Subban.
Pickard is better than Subban.No.
McPhee took Fleury because he was the best goalie available and he's the face of the franchise, nobody knew that he would take a knee to the face last night. He took Pickard because he was Colorado's best option and he took Miller from Boston because he was their best option, are you following?
McPhee probably had Subban as his no.2 selection from Boston and when he came on waivers he took him and got whatever he could for Pickard.
Not every move he makes is awful because you don't like him.
Montreal would offer Montoya but doubt he's what your looking for. I think its time Montreal has Lindgren up to play with the big club.
LOL does McPhee have another Forsberg lying around?