sting101
Registered User
- Feb 8, 2012
- 16,035
- 15,058
Except Chatfield would get his ass handed to him.Imagine if Podkolzin chirps Chatfield at a bar and Chatfield one punches him out....Chatfield becomes the new Bieska
Except Chatfield would get his ass handed to him.Imagine if Podkolzin chirps Chatfield at a bar and Chatfield one punches him out....Chatfield becomes the new Bieska
Except Chatfield would get his ass handed to him.
the point of that movie was the under sized full of heart boxer overcame the bigger tougher Russian
Therefore excellent reference from one of the best movies with the best soundtracks
100%, but I think he regresses this year after those EN Goals/Assists padded his stats last year.Pearson isn't even signed past this year and probably should be dealt for picks at the deadline.
100%, but I think he regresses this year after those EN Goals/Assists padded his stats last year.
TrueI don’t think so. As long as Canucks are good he’ll get those opportunities. Horvat line gets like 80% of the empty net time.
His team just locked up the best Russian prospect since OV/Malkin to a 5 year contract. Likely to go 1st/2nd OA in the 2023 draft. Wonder if you’re picking in the top 2 in that draft you’re willing to wait 3-4 years to come over.
Probably wont be taken in the top 3 if they have to wait 3 years. But if hes that good I can see a team picking 4-5 taking him. I mean we are waiting 4 years for Juolevi.
Probably wont be taken in the top 3 if they have to wait 3 years. But if hes that good I can see a team picking 4-5 taking him. I mean we are waiting 4 years for Juolevi.
Probably wont be taken in the top 3 if they have to wait 3 years. But if hes that good I can see a team picking 4-5 taking him. I mean we are waiting 4 years for Juolevi.
Michkov is the type of talent that should be taken first overall even if you expected him to stay in the KHL for 5 years.
He is poised to break the all time record for U16 scoring in the MHL. He has 25 points in 24 games so far, compared to Kucherov's 54 in 53 in 2009-10.
Keep in mind he has a December birthday, so he only just turned 16 a few days ago, so while Kucherov put up those numbers in his 16-17 age season, Michkov is technically doing it in his 15-16 age season (although really he is only 6 months younger than Kucherov was).
but if you're a GM, do you want to draft a player with your 1OA pick knowing your horrible team will not get any immediate help until you're probably fired?? you're asking them to do something that is detrimental to their own employment. seeing this is a Podkolzin thread, you will not have any input to the way he will be developed, you are fighting strong political forces within Russia trying to retain as many stars within their sphere to gain political favors. What if Michkov is convinced that national duty trumps his own earning power? hes probably starting to be influenced at 16 now, what if he signs another 2 years after that?? How long have we heard about the legend of Kaprizov? I doubt he will be selected top 2 with all these questions in mind.
I know you aren't suppose to gauge a player off of world juniors, but I am really hoping to see him light it up at the WJC. It would give me some hope that this guy can do all the little things that we see him doing (strong on the puck, hard worker, leader, etc), plus be a top offensive threat in the NHL. If he is near the top of the scoring at the end of the tournament, then I will confidently be able to predict that he will be an elite or near elite player. I mean, if this guy can be a 70 to 80 point guy on top what we know he can already do, he will be a force. It's not really a bold prediction either, given the history of what top scorers in the WJC go on to become.
Horvat and Podzolkin on the same line could have the makings a great matchup line in another year or two. After watching Horvat in the playoffs you can really see the value that a second line brings with bigger players who can shine once other coaches focus on shutting down the top line. Podzolkin and Horvat together with a third big guy could really change the makeup of the Canucks into a more heavy team which is what is needed in a long playoff run.
I actually think that ^ could be a really good line if Podkolzin works out. It could be a match-up type line that also produces top 6 offense. Leave Boeser with Petey and find a LW to play with them. Two very different look type lines but both could be effectiveMiller - Horvat - Podkolzin ...would be....?
I totally agree. Pods appears to be a high level playmaker, and Bo needs that kind of winger. Plus, Pods adds size, skill, and mean too - of course.I actually think that ^ could be a really good line if Podkolzin works out. It could be a match-up type line that also produces top 6 offense. Leave Boeser with Petey and find a LW to play with them. Two very different look type lines but both could be effective
Not sure if cap space allows but if they scooped up a guy like Hoffman to play with Petey and Boeser...oh man that would be sweet. It would leave us with two legit line-drivers on the second line in Jt and BoI totally agree. Pods appears to be a high level playmaker, and Bo needs that kind of winger. Plus, Pods adds size, skill, and mean too - of course.
And that would drop Pearson and Jake to the third line, which is (on a winning team) those two would play.Not sure if cap space allows but if they scooped up a guy like Hoffman to play with Petey and Boeser...oh man that would be sweet. It would leave us with two legit line-drivers on the second line in Jt and Bo