Friedman: Vancouver and Carolina discussed possible Pettersson trade; VAN and EP resume extension negotiations

Status
Not open for further replies.

JKG33

Leafs & Kings
Oct 31, 2009
6,227
9,259
Winnipeg
I can't help but feel like the Canucks would be a better team with Necas, Kotkaniemei, and say they turn those 1sts into Guentzal?

Guentzal-Miller-Boeser
Kotkaniemi-Lindholm-Necas

That's some chel franchise mode shit but that could be the best top 6 in the league
 

Lempo

Recovering Future Considerations Truther
Sponsor
Feb 23, 2014
26,893
83,866
Likely included Jarvis.

Story goes - Waddell made big and final offer, got ghosted for a while, then the next response was, you’re out, which left the Canes no time to pivot elsewhere before the deadline. They had placed all their eggs in the Meier basket and figured their offer was too good to refuse.

Probably a good idea to take all of that with a grain of salt. It’s a healthy bit of speculation.
What's more, afterwards it looked apparent that Meier was going to NJ all that time, and SJ really wasn't bona fide trading Meier to Canes at any point but they were just dragged along either to drive the price up or for some other reason.

Supposedly the offer Canes made was objectively the better one, but who knows for sure.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SlavinAway

canadianmagpie

Registered User
Jan 26, 2010
5,413
1,334
I can't help but feel like the Canucks would be a better team with Necas, Kotkaniemei, and say they turn those 1sts into Guentzal?

Guentzal-Miller-Boeser
Kotkaniemi-Lindholm-Necas

That's some chel franchise mode shit but that could be the best top 6 in the league

I would have liked to have see a Myers/Pesce swap included in the deal as well. I think Pesce would be the perfect RD to Hughes and allows Hronek to move to a different line to create some better puckmoving skill on another pairing.
 

Bourne Endeavor

Registered User
Apr 6, 2009
37,871
6,228
Montreal, Quebec
why is Pettersson jerking the Canucks around? I don't get it

just trying to get more money?

From what little has actually gotten out, it appears that's partially the case. At the start of the season we were pretty firmly in the 11M range while Pettersson wanted 12M. Once the season got going, Pettersson just didn't want to deal with contract talks at all. I don't necessarily think it was a money thing but just him walking to focus.

He's since admitted he didn't expect the media to get this bad. Hence why they've started talking again. Granted, you have to wonder if the Carolina talks spooked him.
 
  • Like
Reactions: sepHF

McJC

Registered User
May 2, 2010
3,969
1,106
Edmonton
I can't help but feel like the Canucks would be a better team with Necas, Kotkaniemei, and say they turn those 1sts into Guentzal?

Guentzal-Miller-Boeser
Kotkaniemi-Lindholm-Necas

That's some chel franchise mode shit but that could be the best top 6 in the league

That's not even the best top 6 in the division
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ghetty Green

AhosDatsyukian

Registered User
Sep 25, 2020
11,117
32,410
Likely included Jarvis.

Story goes - Waddell made big and final offer, got ghosted for a while, then the next response was, you’re out, which left the Canes no time to pivot elsewhere before the deadline. They had placed all their eggs in the Meier basket and figured their offer was too good to refuse.

Probably a good idea to take all of that with a grain of salt. It’s a healthy bit of speculation.
Jarvis is more valuable than Meier so thanks to the Sharks for sending him to NJ
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cardiac Jerks

Unsustainable

Seth Jarvis is Elite
Apr 14, 2012
38,036
105,369
North Carolina
I would have liked to have see a Myers/Pesce swap included in the deal as well. I think Pesce would be the perfect RD to Hughes and allows Hronek to move to a different line to create some better puckmoving skill on another pairing.
so what you're saying is:

Necas, KK, Pesce, 1st, Morrow
for
EP and Myers?
 

KaraLupin

카라
Jun 4, 2009
2,369
315
Vancouver
I can't help but feel like the Canucks would be a better team with Necas, Kotkaniemei, and say they turn those 1sts into Guentzal?

Guentzal-Miller-Boeser
Kotkaniemi-Lindholm-Necas

That's some chel franchise mode shit but that could be the best top 6 in the league
Yeah the first line looks beastly, but jury still out on Lindholm offensively, as well as KK as LW2 isn't optimal. This also puts Canucks into cap hell next season if they plan on keeping everyone.
 

JKG33

Leafs & Kings
Oct 31, 2009
6,227
9,259
Winnipeg
Yeah the first line looks beastly, but jury still out on Lindholm offensively, as well as KK as LW2 isn't optimal. This also puts Canucks into cap hell next season if they plan on keeping everyone.
Yea personally I'm not a huge KK fan either. But if Mikheyev goes to Pittsburgh in a Guentzel deal then ya'll wouldn't be in cap hell that badly even with Lindholm and Guentzel re-signed (if they're willing).

I know Lindholm and Guentzel are both older than EP, but if you can get them combined for $4m-ish more than what you'd pay EP that's a tradeoff I'd happily make if I were the Canucks
 
  • Like
Reactions: oceanchild

UrbanImpact

Registered User
Apr 12, 2021
4,058
6,074
25 yr old 100 point centres who has garnered selke votes before will cost a pretty penny.

To have even gotten the Canucks to even consider an offer, it probably would have to be something like :

1st
Necas
Nichiskin
B Nadeua

for

EP40
4th

Who knows though, Rutherford and Allvin may have just been bluffing EP40.....regardless, that takes a lot of cojones
 
  • Haha
Reactions: WreckingCrew

Nucklehead Supreme

Registered User
Jul 10, 2011
4,251
2,126
It’s not really. I don’t believe they would’ve dealt him, unless the offer was too good to pass up, but it gave them an opportunity to make Pettersson give them an honest answer of whether he wants to be here longterm. If Canuck’s management had no indication of what Pettersson’s future plans were, and it sounds like they didn’t up until recently, it severely hinders what sort of moves they’re able to make this trade deadline.

This is the part that every fan of other teams "expert" on here can't seem to comprehend.
 

oceanchild

Registered User
Jul 5, 2009
3,585
1,634
Whitehorse, YT
Anyone who thinks aho should or would have been in the deal doesn’t know hockey and that’s all that really needs to be said.
Why is it that you only know hockey if you think Aho shouldn’t be in the deal. That’s a rather arrogant stance to take. I’m sure some rational exsist that would make it a reasonable stance to include him.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tilly123123

oceanchild

Registered User
Jul 5, 2009
3,585
1,634
Whitehorse, YT
25 yr old 100 point centres who has garnered selke votes before will cost a pretty penny.

To have even gotten the Canucks to even consider an offer, it probably would have to be something like :

1st
Necas
Nichiskin
B Nadeua

for

EP40
4th

Who knows though, Rutherford and Allvin may have just been bluffing EP40.....regardless, that takes a lot of cojones
I think it would have been more than that for the Canucks to disrupt the season and approach Pettersson.
 
  • Like
Reactions: UrbanImpact

UrbanImpact

Registered User
Apr 12, 2021
4,058
6,074
in typical HF form, the value of magic bean prospects and draft picks are worth more than proven established players.
 

Frankie Blueberries

Allergic to draft picks
Jan 27, 2016
9,200
10,672
Why is it that you only know hockey if you think Aho shouldn’t be in the deal. That’s a rather arrogant stance to take. I’m sure some rational exsist that would make it a reasonable stance to include him.
I am guessing it’s because Carolina wouldn’t be that much more competitive with Pettersson in over Aho. An upgrade, but maybe not a huge one. Although Pettersson has put up more impressive playoff stats than Aho, so the upgrade could be more significant than the poster is giving credit to.

If they are suggesting that Aho is somehow better than Pettersson, then they are out to lunch. Even with contracts considered, Pettersson has put up more impressive stats while playing with worse linemates than Aho and is a year younger.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tilly123123

oceanchild

Registered User
Jul 5, 2009
3,585
1,634
Whitehorse, YT
I am guessing it’s because Carolina wouldn’t be that much more competitive with Pettersson in over Aho. An upgrade, but maybe not a huge one. Although Pettersson has put up more impressive playoff stats than Aho, so the upgrade could be more significant than the poster is giving credit to.

If they are suggesting that Aho is somehow better than Pettersson, then they are out to lunch. Even with contracts considered, Pettersson has put up more impressive stats while playing with worse linemates than Aho and is a year younger.
I agree the point would be to have them on the same team and push for a cup, and I would agree to that line of thinking. But to suggest that anyone that has a different stance somehow doesn’t know the sport seems a bit over the top.

Maybe they can start a thread and explain it all to us.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Frankie Blueberries

sandwichbird2023

Registered User
Aug 4, 2004
3,886
1,951
I can't help but feel like the Canucks would be a better team with Necas, Kotkaniemei, and say they turn those 1sts into Guentzal?

Guentzal-Miller-Boeser
Kotkaniemi-Lindholm-Necas

That's some chel franchise mode shit but that could be the best top 6 in the league
That "2nd line" is crap. Lindholm is playing like a 3rd liner, and KK has regressed even more offensively. We will be a 1-line team if that ends up happening, while costing substantially more than just retaining Petey and adding some middle-6 wingers (assuming Guentzel and Lindholm are retained beyond this season).

Does KK even have any trade value at this point? I feel like if he is moved, he is at best value-neutral, but from a Vancouver perspective I would view him as a negative-value asset. The term left on his contract is NOT an asset at the rate he is producing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: gianni
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad