The result means more then nothing. It means something
Not really, no. The final score means nothing. For Team USA, these camps aren't about who wins or loses (although the players obviously want to win) but are about player evaluation, chemistry, and a little bit about the coaches laying the foundation for the system they want the team to play come December.
Every team is at a different stage of the process. Sweden and Finland have smaller teams closer to what they imagine their final team would be whereas Team USA brings two full teams and spends half the camp just whittling their split-squads down by a dozen players.
Lucia is shuffling players in and out of roles trying to see who can do what and who fits where, if at all. Team USA's PK has sucked. Why? Is it because they have barely practiced it and they're trying all kinds of players in every role to see what they're capable of? Come the real games, they will be practicing it and they'll have PKers only out there. Now, does that mean at the actual WJC they'll be good at the PK (or in general)? Of course not but this is just the first step building towards that possibility.
Team USA split-squads used to regularly dominate this camp against Sweden/Finland (before the second December camp implementation and a shift in focus) but it didn't translate at the real tournament because this is summer exhibition hockey where the players are just starting to get in shape for the upcoming hockey season and all the teams are in different stages of their team building process.
These tournaments mean something for the individual players so a guy like Samuelsson - having a horrible camp - is probably playing themselves off a team USAH wants him on. But the scoreboard results here mean nothing. The results at the WJC mean something.