It's not quite that black and white, and this is a poor example.
"Poor" meaning in this case "devastating to the pro fighting arguments".
Bobbyjet said:
This was not any NHL game, it was the PO's. Bollig risked a lot if he reacted, resulting in multiple minutes in penalties to take out revenge right then and there - no matter what he had done in that instant, he wasn't going to miraculously make Hossa get better.
Regardless, the rule is there and the fact it is there makes the "fighting prevents cheap shots" argument that much weaker. You're basically changing the argument from "goons cut down on cheap shots" to "goons would cut down on cheap shots if it wasnt for the instigator rule", which is more than just arguable in and of itself since there is absolutely no objective evidence that this is the case, but the fact is the rule IS there, making it moot.
A goon literally skating beside Hossa didn't stop Torres from injuring him. That's as close to a perfect situation you can get for a goon, and he did nothing, NOTHING, to keep it from happening.
Bobbyjet said:
It was the risk of taking the 2 minutes for instigating in a playoff game that was the big deterrent for Bollig or anyone else on the ice. The best think we could have done was score a couple of goals during the 5 minute major to Torres. There would be plenty of opportunities in the future to get Torres back (and that clock is still ticking, by the way).
So the argument ISN'T that they prevent cheap shots, but that they can be used to get revenge at some later point? Ask Thornton how that goes. Shouldn't be hard, he has a lot of free time right now.
Bobbyjet said:
The instigator penalty as it is defined now was (and is) one of the worst mistakes the NHL has ever made. It allows predators to hide behind the rules. By all means, take out staged fightng, but the players code will remain in tact.
"The code" is the biggest crock of you know what ever invented. It is the abdication of a player using his brain, a retroactive justification for neanderthalism on the ice. If it's being brought up by a player, they're invariably trying to justify doing something douchy. Fact is every player in the league does whatever it takes to win, generally if they don't or won't they don't make the NHL. That includes breaking this vaunted "code" whenever and wherever they please, and THAT includes all the old-schoolers who are the ones who still bring it up (almost all goons themselves).
Anyways, that aside, I remember when Gil Stein brought the instigator rule in. I think they thought by poisoning instigation fighting would die out on its own, but it was never enforced that way. But what it WAS good at stopping was something that still bothers me when it still sort of pseudo-happens now - goons before that weren't just being used to stop cheap shots (in theory), they were being used to stop ALL physical play. Guy gets hit cleanly? Send your goon after him. I don't know about you, but I think that kind of crap is already bad enough as it is, I don't want a LEGITIMATE way of this happening to come about.