I wonder how this affects the seedings for next year. With Slovakia also doing poorly, Canada likely out in the QF, and one of Switzerland and Germany making it to the SF, there could be some really lopsided groups.
So dissapointed with this tournament. I've been a big believer in the depth of US hockey as evidenced by the comparitively large number of NHL players and draft picks we produce but results like this really make me question that belief. There are always questions of chemistry in an event like this but, to me, it simply can't be an excuse for such a bad showing. If the Finns, Swedes and Czechs can have the showings they're having with rosters that appear to be so weak on paper, why the hell can't we?
For our success at the junior level to mean anything we have to become a force at all adult level tournaments. If the Finns, with a talent pool the size of Minnesota, can have as many medals at the adult level as they do, there's NO reason we can't.
I wonder how this affects the seedings for next year. With Slovakia also doing poorly, Canada likely out in the QF, and one of Switzerland and Germany making it to the SF, there could be some really lopsided groups.
I wonder how this affects the seedings for next year. With Slovakia also doing poorly, Canada likely out in the QF, and one of Switzerland and Germany making it to the SF, there could be some really lopsided groups.
Seedings are based on world ranking. USA entered the tournament in 3rd after the Olympics, they'll likely fall to either 5th or 6th.
If the Czechs beat Finland, they'll be 6th, otherwise 5th. If 5th, their group would be either Sweden or Finland, & the 12th & 13th seeds (could be Germany, Denmark, Latvia). If 6th, it's either Sweden or Finland, the 11th seed (Norway, Latvia, Germany or Denmark) & Austria.