I don't know what to tell you, man. You asked a question to a message board, I gave you my opinion, and then the points you used to push back on my opinion are:
1. What if a fighter purposely gets put into a guillotine?
2. Compare it to a completely different scenario in a completely different sport.
And no, it's not at all the same. If the ref thinks the puck is in and calls it a goal, they simply review it. If it was, great, game's over. If it wasn't, they reverse it and have a face off which they would have done anyway if the ref didn't make the wrong call. No harm no foul. Stopping a fight is completely different for the reasons I already stated. You're letting a guy recover when he very well could have been on the verge of getting stopped if the ref didn't stop the fight. So then all you're doing is shifting the anger for the ref from one fighter to another. It's not solving anything.
If you want to compare it to hockey, it would be closer to if a ref blew the whistle but the puck was still loose. It's unfortunate, but you've go to live with the ref's call. You don't put everybody back where they were, put the puck on the goal line, and then tell everybody "OK, on the count of 3".