Perennial
Registered User
- Jun 27, 2020
- 3,492
- 1,523
Ok but again where do you subjectively draw the line on whats a PED? Because people are taking stuff that improve their performance, both legally and illegally (if fighters making themselves more dangerous is something that actually concerns you)
and you didn’t refute anything I said months ago and you haven’t done it here either. Propose what you would do better to ensure that there is a true level playing field, otherwise this is just virtue signaling to me. Because anti-doping is a nice idea in theory and something everybody should want, it just doesn’t work and doesn’t do what you think it does. At least the way it’s practiced now. It’s almost like the idea of a utopia
you ESPECIALLY can’t fire somebody because they’re jacked with no failed tests- that’s just the dumbest, most authoritarian anti-fighter bullshit I’ve ever heard. That’s giving the death penalty on purely circumstantial evidence
So, if someone is obviously using PEDs to gain an advantage but hasn't been caught, the UFC should be fine risking the health of another fighter by matching them up with the cheater?
The sole reason to ban fighters from juicing is to protect their opponent...
With that said, I don't want to have this conversation with you anymore...