- Jan 23, 2010
- 25,107
- 15,229
I don't know that it is USADA itself, but the whole situation is absolutely slimy. They aren't coming up with the picogram/pulsing effect for anyone but Jon Jones. Brock Lesnar hasn't been off steroids since he was in JR High School, but he was able to compete at UFC 200. I know you know all the examples, so I'll stop there, but if you make enough money for the UFC, they will bend the science to fit whatever story to let you fight. Like you said, if you're a prelim fighter, though, they (UFC/USADA/athletic commissions/whoever) don't give a **** and you're suspended for 2+ years. Changing the rules and punishments based on how much money you bring in is the definition of being slimy.
Sure, though as your last sentence described it's not the science that they are bending it's simply the application of the rule. I agree there is a science issue too, but that issue is that they don't really know what causes certain things to come up since there isn't enough data so in some cases (like the Jones pulsing thing) they are just taking their best guess.
It is been going around for a bit now that the UFC knows they screwed this up and are working to bump up the threshold so that most of these potential cases will simply not come up anymore. For example if the threshold for being flagged positive was .01, maybe now it will be .1 and that will eliminate most of the tainted supplements or "pinch of salt in a swimming pool" cases. The problem is that they're a sport that has built themselves on being clean and busting people and it's hard to admit that you went too far and now you have to walk it back.