Trinstin
Registered User
Again, wrong: 23rd Overall - Conner Bleackley
Page six is when it gets good. The biggest criticism of the pick in the first half of that thread is "safe," which still seemed to be a middle six player. Significantly more than Heard was projecting to be at the time.
Well, seeing as I was telling you what I remember, I don't think I was wrong in remembering that. Again, the pick was pathetically weak and that was the general sentiment that I remember. I'm not going through threads and threads in the hopes of proving my memory wrong. I don't care enough other than to again tell you this pick sucked at the time and that was the general concensus. When GMs make obviously horrible picks like this it makes me wonder, but Sakic can be forgiven as he does most things right.