KoozNetsOff 92
Hala Madrid
- Apr 6, 2016
- 8,567
- 8,229
Matt Murray is at 0.925
1 1987 FI Tuukka Rask 395 2.24 0.923
2 1965 CZ Dominik Hašek 735 2.20 0.922
3 1986 US Cory Schneider 330 2.28 0.922
4 1989 CA Braden Holtby 307 2.31 0.922
5 1987 CA Carey Price 509 2.40 0.920
6 1974 US Tim Thomas 426 2.52 0.920
7 1988 RU Sergei Bobrovsky330 2.45 0.920
8 1982 SE Henrik Lundqvist742 2.32 0.920
9 1979 CA Roberto Luongo 966 2.50 0.919
10 1986 US Ben Bishop 270 2.32 0.919
So amazing, so good
http://www.quanthockey.com/nhl/records/nhl-goalies-all-time-save-percentage-leaders.html
By no means do I think OP is comparing Rask to Hasek, Roy etc...I hope not at least
I think its important to remember when Roy played, sv % was significantly lower (just like how we accept scoring is lower today. Direct correlation.) As far as how well he outperformed his peers in particular seasons, he has a few that can stand to Hasek's.
Hasek was the desperation save god of the dead-puck-era
Considering most of the names with him on that list were also born in the 80's, it seems more of an era based accomplishment than one that is reflective of his place in the history of the game. A good goalie, but lets see how he does in the back stretch of his career.
Roy's peak was between 1987-88 and 1991-92. Hardly any different from Hasek, only slightly shorter.Hasek was light-years ahead of his competition. There are no comparables. His 6 year run between 93/94 and 98/99 is more or less Gretzky/Orr level dominance over his peers (who both conveniently have 6-year runs where they were comically ahead of the rest of the players in the league).
Hasek relative to peers 1993/94-1998/99; minimum 200 games played
Roy's is a little tougher to compare considering a big part of his story is how quickly he established himself and you don't see confirmed save % numbers until his 3rd season, but his best 6 year period where he won 3 Vezinas, was top 3 in Vezina voting 5 of the 6 years, and 6th in the other season, it looks like this:
Roy relative to peers 1988/89-1993/94; minimum 200 games
This just goes to show how insane Hasek was. Obviously not a coincidence that all other goalies are either still playing or (for Thomas) were very recently playing.
And to Think Toronto traded him for a guy Boston was going to put on waivers.
1 1987 FI Tuukka Rask 395 2.24 0.923
2 1965 CZ Dominik Hašek 735 2.20 0.922
3 1986 US Cory Schneider 330 2.28 0.922
4 1989 CA Braden Holtby 307 2.31 0.922
5 1987 CA Carey Price 509 2.40 0.920
6 1974 US Tim Thomas 426 2.52 0.920
7 1988 RU Sergei Bobrovsky330 2.45 0.920
8 1982 SE Henrik Lundqvist742 2.32 0.920
9 1979 CA Roberto Luongo 966 2.50 0.919
10 1986 US Ben Bishop 270 2.32 0.919
So amazing, so good
http://www.quanthockey.com/nhl/records/nhl-goalies-all-time-save-percentage-leaders.html
Huh? There definitely is a debate between Hasek and Roy.
http://www.sportsnet.ca/hockey/nhl/nhl-goalies-better-with-high-shot-volumes/
http://ingoalmag.com/analysis/shot-volume-affect-save-percentage/
http://hfboards.mandatory.com/showthread.php?t=1632645&page=3
This post from Deathstroke really caught my attention:
JFJ jr. How badly did that trade set the leafs back?
Broduer is objectively the best goalie of all time. He has the most wins and the point of the game is to win.
You've got to be kidding with this, it's Roy and it's not close. Hasek was the desperation save god of the dead-puck-era, Roy was who you wanted in the post-season when things mattered.
Hasek was the GOAT, not only do the stats support that, but watching him play, and following the narrative of the league supports that.