Mach85
Registered User
- Mar 14, 2013
- 3,899
- 678
It looks like we're basically locked into drafting at #5
This will be the highest we've selected since 1997 (Vernon Wells).
Safe to say this is a really big selection for the front office.
Anyone have thoughts on Asa Lacy?
I feel like the Royals will pass us based on the tough schedule we have to finish the year. They have 51 wins right now and Jays sitting at 55.
Unfortunately KC has an absolute murderer's row to end their year too. Tons of Twins to go with some Astros and A's.
Their series against the Marlins comes up next and those teams are the two below is. That one could be a hint at where we end up.
Edit: it's worth noting that the Marlins don't have as bad of a schedule coming up. They're 5 games off our pace right now. The more concerning piece is run differential - which hints at some teams above us having a chance to fall.
Yes, the Jays have been fairly "lucky" when it comes to run differential vs record in terms of the tank.
We have the 9th worst run differential, but are in 5th last in the standings.
The good news is we only have 22 games remaining, so there isn't much time for a big swing in the standings (although if some teams go on a losing tear like the Rockies have been on, we could slip a spot or two in draft position).
I'm not sure if there are any real tiers to the draft next year where we want to be above a certain pick to get a real stud, but we should have a high selection regardless.
There is something psychologically pleasing about having a "Top 5 Pick", though.
Is anyone still up set what we got in return for making Sanchez someone else's problem?
No it was a garbage for garbage deal but did get upset to see an ace turning into garbage in front of our eyes
Bo is such an amazing player.
Is anyone still up set what we got in return for making Sanchez someone else's problem?
Well, yes?
Because the team traded a guy who should have had a bit of value (even if it wasn't much), a competent relief pitcher, and a decent prospect for a completely useless 26 y/o bum. Three ok assets for one worthless one.
Well, yes?
Because the team traded a guy who should have had a bit of value (even if it wasn't much), a competent relief pitcher, and a decent prospect for a completely useless 26 y/o bum. Three ok assets for one worthless one.
I didn't like the trade at all, but Sanchez and Biagini have both been roughly replacement-level pitchers the last couple years. If Fisher is a "completely useless bum", then so are they.
Fisher is a guy who can't hit MLB pitching at age 26 and is a total adventure in the field.
Biagini is a competent relief pitcher whose numbers were skewed in 2017-18 when the team tried to convert him to a starter and it failed miserably. He's about a 1 WAR relief pitcher which is an OK asset.
Stevenson is a decent prospect.
Sanchez has struggled badly in recent years but should have still carried a bit of value due to his age and 2016 dominance.
After seeing Fisher for 5 weeks now, I wouldn't have traded any one of those three assets for him, much less all three. He's really not good. He's a poor man's Teoscar and Teoscar is *barely* an MLB player.
Garbage in garbage out.Fisher is a guy who can't hit MLB pitching at age 26 and is a total adventure in the field.
Biagini is a competent relief pitcher whose numbers were skewed in 2017-18 when the team tried to convert him to a starter and it failed miserably. He's about a 1 WAR relief pitcher which is an OK asset.
Stevenson is a decent prospect.
Sanchez has struggled badly in recent years but should have still carried a bit of value due to his age and 2016 dominance.
After seeing Fisher for 5 weeks now, I wouldn't have traded any one of those three assets for him, much less all three. He's really not good. He's a poor man's Teoscar and Teoscar is *barely* an MLB player.
Fisher is a guy who can't hit MLB pitching at age 26 and is a total adventure in the field.
Biagini is a competent relief pitcher whose numbers were skewed in 2017-18 when the team tried to convert him to a starter and it failed miserably. He's about a 1 WAR relief pitcher which is an OK asset.
Stevenson is a decent prospect.
Sanchez has struggled badly in recent years but should have still carried a bit of value due to his age and 2016 dominance.
After seeing Fisher for 5 weeks now, I wouldn't have traded any one of those three assets for him, much less all three. He's really not good. He's a poor man's Teoscar and Teoscar is *barely* an MLB player.
Who cares, they moved out some guys that were not coming back anyway for a chance to see if this guy is something. Cleared out some 40 man spots too.