PensandCaps
Beddy Tlueger
- May 22, 2015
- 27,648
- 18,022
Nah. Alot of times the 2nd assist is most important.Just eliminate the second assist.
Nah. Alot of times the 2nd assist is most important.Just eliminate the second assist.
And beards. Thornton and Burns should get 50 each for awesome beards. Each missing tooth is also worth 10. Cause like value to a hockey team.
Would rather remove points entirely. Just have separate goals and assists columns. Art Ross can just be for most assists, which most of the time it is anyways... And keep the Rocket the same.
Would rather remove points entirely. Just have separate goals and assists columns. Art Ross can just be for most assists, which most of the time it is anyways... And keep the Rocket the same.
And art ross winner gets 70p. No thanks.This. Kill the secondary assist and go from there. Primary point production is all that matters.
Agreed. Not all assists are equal, not all goals are equal. Some goals were almost all on the goal scorer other time the secondary assist guy did the most work. The current system is fine.Player A skates end to end dekes both defensemen takes a shot on net that rebounds out and hits player B in the back of the head and goes into the net.
So player B should be awarded more points because he got lucky?
Goals and assists cannot be judged so black and white like some people want and think should happen.
Some times the goal scorer does most of the work. Some times the player who gets the 1st assist did most of the work. Some times it is the player with the 2nd assist that did most of the work. And then even some times a player that doesn't even get a point does most of the work.
Would rather remove points entirely. Just have separate goals and assists columns. Art Ross can just be for most assists, which most of the time it is anyways... And keep the Rocket the same.
Agreed. 'Points' is a dumb idea.
Goals, assists, second assists. Just because a 2nd assist is 'just as important as the goal' one out of 100 times, doesn't mean it's generally as valuable. Should we give a point to the guy screening the goalie? I'd argue he's more important than anything else in the modern NHL.
Agreed. 'Points' is a dumb idea.
Goals, assists, second assists. Just because a 2nd assist is 'just as important as the goal' one out of 100 times, doesn't mean it's generally as valuable. Should we give a point to the guy screening the goalie? I'd argue he's more important than anything else in the modern NHL.
What if one player has 36 goals (the majority scored in 4-1, 5-2 games) with 1 game winner and the other player has 30 goals with 12 game winners?I don't think it's that hard to understand that goals are worth more than assists. For every goal scored, there can be 0-2 assists, but for 0-2 assists, there is only one goal.
Ties are broken with goals. If a player has 100 points with 35 goals and another player has 100 with 36 goals, the player with the most goals is awarded the Art Ross.
The system should not be changed though because it is very hard to quantify how much more a goal is worth than an assist. If you quantify goals, you also have to quantify primary vs secondary assist.
What if one player has 36 goals (the majority scored in 4-1, 5-2 games) with 1 game winner and the other player has 30 goals with 12 game winners?
I don't know but some game winning goals are pretty important to me. Yes goals are goals but if one player has 4 hat tricks, is invisible for 3 weeks, scores 2 more, repeat and is basically a non factor in games they don't score vs. Someone who scores every other game, that's an important context to me.Goals are goals. The player who scored 36 goals scored more goals regardless of how many game winners he scored. Do people even count game winning goals? I don’t think they provide much unless it’s an OT winner.