Fire Sweeney
Registered User
Some much for the 'Cup window' where this team was going to win multiple championships...
They're in a good position to do it this year...
Some much for the 'Cup window' where this team was going to win multiple championships...
Some much for the 'Cup window' where this team was going to win multiple championships...
were you around to see what the "window" looked like for the prior decade to Chia?
Not a fan of all Chia did, but I`d be one spoiled SOB(not saying you are) if I whined about this team not delivering to me multiple championships after watching this organization turning into an absolutely irrelevant franchise which, not so long ago, overpaid to drag players here who helped me witness one Cup win and another final
Does that mean I`m content ? Nope, nor shall I ignore an organization that actually had me feeling they had a legit shot every year for quite some time now up to this past season
I was referring to all the people around here who assumed this team was going to win multiple Cups.
Been a diehard since 77.
Let the mediocre years begin, sad to see really, but I guess in the long run it had to happen which is too bad because it didn't with a competent head office.
This is where I would almost rather see them totally suck a few years and finish low for good draft picks than finish middle of the pack where you can't rally compete for a cup but the draft spot is a massive gamble.
But then a lot of teams are going to find themselves in cap hell and they are worse off than the Bruins. What worries me is that forward wise we just don't seem to have much in Providence ready for the NHL (and some I doubt will ever be ready). Chiarelli really blew the drafting imo.
Can the cap go up and down every year? Seems kind of ******** that the cap can fluctuate year after year. There should be set time periods where the cap is reevaluated for teams. Maybe that's the way it is now, I dunno.
Oh I know you have (that`s why I put in brackets I wasn`t referring to you)
Teams like the Hawks/Bruins and Kings will be the norm IMO in a Cap era, a 5, maybe 6 year window to snag the Cup, then rebuild or reload, ya win, your roster gets pricey
Hawks have players they can move. Not sure what their prospect pipeline looks like but they will have to start bringing them up to fit the Toews and Kane salaries under the cap.
I think you are too rosey on the Hawks situation.
Sharp - 6 million until 2017-18 more. Gregory Campbell had more even strength goals than Sharp did this year.
Crawford - The line for the 30 year old Chris Osgood clone making a million less than Rask until 2020-21? I'm sure it will be long.
Bickell - 4 million for 28 points. You know who else had 28 points? Chris Kelly. Kelly is gone after coming season. Bickell isn't a UFA until 2017-2018.
Hawks are in hot water
Dale down in Florida is looking for a top 6 goal scoring winger. Sharp is probably a Panther at draft IMO but Hawks will still be able to move him if they need be. Wont get great return but some picks/prospects likely
I can't believe anyone is going to take Sharp off the Hawks hands and give them prospects. His contract is awful considering his production this year, and he is not young. I can't imagine a small market team eating that unless they get to reduce it substantially by giving up a bad contract, or if Chicago retains
Plus, when you win a cup, everyone wants to get paid, even the bottom 6.
A Chara-Byfuglien pairing would be the most terrifying D pairing in NHL history.
I keep saying kellys contract is right at fair market value for a third line center good defensively with an outside shot at 15 goals and winner experience and I use guys like brian bolland and ron sutter and boyde Gordon and matt stajan and lars eller among others to prove my point.
I suppose I will be proven right or wrong this summer now that kellys biggest supporter is gone and his third line spot has been lost to spooner but I have a strong suspicion that we wont have any trouble finding someone that wants Kelly on their team for his leadership and pk skill.
heck im someone that would want it myself if there was any way we could afford it ourselves
Kelly, in Boston's hour of need down the stretch drive after the deadline, posted a ZERO goal, 2 assist stat line in 20 games with ample ice time.
Third line Center?
He's barely even a 4th line C at this point, no matter how good he is defensively. He's nothing special on face-offs either. I like his leadership but it ain't worth what he's being paid.
If Boston can't find a taker for Kelly's contract this summer (which I agree with you I think they will), then he needs to be bought-out, period.
He's never coming close to double digits in goals again. A 1 million cap hit this year and next year is better than a 3 million hit this year and having to ship out any of Seidenberg/Smith/Eriksson/Lucic for pennies on the dollar just to be cap compliant, let alone make any improvements to this team outside of bringing up young players.
Sorry but I think that the buy-outs were a two year deal. IIRC they missed the boat on that.
Those were compliance buy-outs, yes they were only good for the 2013 and 2014 off-seasons before free agency started. Those didn't count against the cap. Can't do them anymore. They couldn't even buy-out Kelly last year (even if they wanted to) because he was considered injured and you couldn't buy out injured players.
Teams can still buy out players but now those buy outs count against the cap. Due to Kelly's age he's owed 2/3 his remaining contract if bought-out, in his case he would get 2 million of the 3 million he's owed, but the cap hit would be spread out over 2 years, so 1 million against the cap this year and another 1 million next year.
I think they will find a taker, some rebuilding team that needs to reach the cap floor and a good veteran leader to help their young players.
Mike, you forgot to tell us going from right to left across your screenI just took the time to layout a 23 man roster... i am not bringing back any ufa... everyone is already signed except hamilton, spooner, connolly, svedberg. Not counting savard we sit at around 63 mill
If the cap is anywhere near 72 we have all the room we need and then some.
if the cap in nearer to 70 its going to be tight
Anything lower than that will require 1 big ticket player to be sacraficed
The lineup i cobble together...
Connolly/krejci/eriksson
smith/bergeron/marchand
pastrnak/spooner/lucic
ferlin/kelly/talbot
griffith/phillips
Hamilton/chara
seidenberg/krug
millar/morrow
trottman
Rask
svedberg