HockeyDBspecialist
Habs 2019 cup champ
Anyone who says Ekblad “sucks” automatically loses the argument.
oh please go read my 2-3 posts in this thread. it has alllll the explanations you so much need
Anyone who says Ekblad “sucks” automatically loses the argument.
Panthers won't be the only team interested. If the Panthers want to acquire Trouba, they would need to outbid other teams.I wouldn't as a Panthers fan. We could offer you a futures base deal with maybe Matheson as a roster player/LHD defenseman.
Dont see why we would help your GM when we know Trouba is very likely to leave WPG.
Rumor is that Trouba wants to play in either Florida, Detroit or New York.Panthers won't be the only team interested. If the Panthers want to acquire Trouba, they would need to outbid other teams.
No, it is throwing him away for nothing. There is no need to throw a 2nd pick in at all as a sweetener. Trouba being the better player is all the sweetener that is needed. A sweetener is a low pick or B prospect, not a legit middle 6 player.I didn't suggest "throwing him away for nothing". My proposed trade has him as a "sweetener" in order to get the deal done. That has value. So you throw in a 2nd rounder or Perreualt. If we agree Perreault is worth a 2nd rounder in a trade, it's essentially the same thing, except for those who have an emotional attachment to Perreault the player.
You are obviously not following the discussion in this thread, nor to you understand the complexity of the entire situation. This trade is much more complex than "Trouba is a better player so the Panthers win the trade".No, it is throwing him away for nothing. There is no need to throw a 2nd pick in at all as a sweetener. Trouba being the better player is all the sweetener that is needed. A sweetener is a low pick or B prospect, not a legit middle 6 player.
i don’t see Ek going anywhere. He’s signed to a long term deal and imo is overpaid at the moment. He needs to work a lot more on his skating, he gets beat often and he insists on pinching down low and doesn't have the speed to get back.
Talon already lost Guds, don’t see him moving Ek even for Trouba.
I’d love Trouba here but don’t see how he could come here (if it’s true he really wants to) with Yandle, Matheson and Ek’s contracts.
PatientPanther is smart and level headed, I like the response and counter offers in their post.
i don’t see Ek going anywhere. He’s signed to a long term deal and imo is overpaid at the moment. He needs to work a lot more on his skating, he gets beat often and he insists on pinching down low and doesn't have the speed to get back.
Talon already lost Guds, don’t see him moving Ek even for Trouba.
I’d love Trouba here but don’t see how he could come here (if it’s true he really wants to) with Yandle, Matheson and Ek’s contracts.
PatientPanther is smart and level headed, I like the response and counter offers in their post.
Ever think that he's on a pretty brutal team and he can't carry them on his own?ya, 90% on the PP.... like I said he is over bloated by his PP stats.
HE.IS.NOT.WHAT.HE.WAS
I know it sucks to hear but Ekblad is not the player you drafted first overall, it just sucks.
Even from Advanced stats + pure show, Trouba is showing better number... Trouba is extremely better defensively.
Ekblad = more than 100 turnovers on 1000+ minutes.
Trouba = more minutes than Ekblad, yet -30 turnovers.
I bring facts, bring me some facts
Right, it is complex. However, you're the one that isn't following the discussion or understanding the entire situation.You are obviously not following the discussion in this thread, nor to you understand the complexity of the entire situation. This trade is much more complex than "Trouba is a better player so the Panthers win the trade".
.you would give up mp AND trouba? Talk about panicking and being desperate
What do you see happening with Trouba? Post a realistic scenario.
Panthers won't be the only team interested. If the Panthers want to acquire Trouba, they would need to outbid other teams.
I think you are the one who is delusional thinking other GMs will be lining up to give Chevy full value for Trouba, knowing full well he's in a pickle. And I never once said we need to "panic", but Chevy does need to plan and start asking around who would be willing trade partners. This proposed trade is for the offseason, not now. It is assumed Trouba is staying with the Jets this season for a cup run.Right, it is complex. However, you're the one that isn't following the discussion or understanding the entire situation.
Your take is; "panic and throw away extra assets at a deal that comes close to meeting our needs"
The rest of us are saying; "relax, we have a pretty valuable commodity. Let's see how it plays out as we get closer, instead of panicking and making a bad trade."
It's not just me, all the other Jets fans in this thread don't agree with your "panic" trade negotiation tactic.
Jesus, done and done. Ekblad is the softest crybaby in the league.
Overly hyped by his Calder and will never play as good as he did.
I dont know. I'm not gm. I dont know the behind the scenes or the politics
I just know giving up that much because you're scared to lose something in 2 years isnt a good business strategy
Link?Rumor is that Trouba wants to play in either Florida, Detroit or New York.
I don't have a link. It's a pretty widely known rumor that has been discussed on these forums for a couple years now.Link?
oh please go read my 2-3 posts in this thread. it has alllll the explanations you so much need
That's the thing. No one knows what the situation actually is. Obviously, I'd rather just sign Trouba to a cheap deal. In this scenario, I'm assuming Trouba has declared to Chevy that he will not re-sign with us and will only negotiate with 2-3 teams. Not perfect. Under these circumstances I would make the deal in OP rather than losing Trouba for nothing or a bunch of spare parts (see Karlsson deal). It's not optimal, but neither will our RHD if he leaves. At least this deal gets us a young top pairing RHD that is signed for 6 more years.
Also, It's 1 1/2 years. and his value will deminish the closer he gets.
Sure lots of players would make lots of teams better. But there's this thing called a salary cap. As an example, Chevy just gave away Armia in order to comply with the cap. He made the Jets better.He's more valuable to play for the jets and walk than give away extra players that make your team better
He's more valuable to play for the jets and walk than give away extra players that make your team better
No, once again it is you that doesn't understand Perreault's situation. Yes, he will likely be a cap casualty. That doesn't mean that we should just throw him into a deal for the hell of it. Why give him away for nothing, when we can get something for him? He actually has value no matter what you think.I think you are the one who is delusional thinking other GMs will be lining up to give Chevy full value for Trouba, knowing full well he's in a pickle. And I never once said we need to "panic", but Chevy does need to plan and start asking around who would be willing trade partners. This proposed trade is for the offseason, not now. It is assumed Trouba is staying with the Jets this season for a cup run.
Sounds like even if we did add Perreault to Trouba, we still wouldn't get Ekblad, which is kind of what I expected. No one is paying full value for Trouba, knowing the full context of his situation.
As several other smart, level-headed posters stated in this thread that Trouba + Perreault for Ekblad would be a best case scenario for the Jets.
And it is obvious that you still don't understand Perreault will be a cap casualty in the very near future.
Do you have a reference for that rumor? I've not seen anything solid in that regard.Rumor is that Trouba wants to play in either Florida, Detroit or New York.