Speculation: Trade Thread Part XI: New year...no trades.

Status
Not open for further replies.

BarbaraAlphanse

Guest
Obviously any team would be better if they had the personnel to have them on the second pairing and not the first. Poti went on to be a top pairing defenseman on two playoff teams once he left here.

Another thing that made me look at Rosival negatively was that contract he got. At the time it was a lot of money for his services.

Money and pairing aside, think both were average to slightly above average. Ideally, 2nd pair guys as you said.
 

Beer League Sniper

Homeless Man's Rick Nash
Apr 27, 2010
4,736
1,545
City in a Forest
We could almost definitely get Heatley at the deadline from MN for not much. Last year of his contract...numbers are down but improving of late.

thoughts?

I want no part of Heatley. Gutless shell of what he used to be a long time ago. I wouldn't waste assets on him.

We should be reloading, selling off a combination of Callahan/Moore/Boyle/Girardi/Stralman/MDZ/Staal to bring in younger pieces.
 

Beer League Sniper

Homeless Man's Rick Nash
Apr 27, 2010
4,736
1,545
City in a Forest
Another thing that made me look at Rosival negatively was that contract he got. At the time it was a lot of money for his services.

Money and pairing aside, think both were average to slightly above average. Ideally, 2nd pair guys as you said.

Completely OT, but anytime I think of Rozsival, I think of this...

Florida%2BPanthers%2Bv%2BNew%2BYork%2BRangers%2BbLMbwo0LMvYl.jpg
 

McRanger

Registered User
Sponsor
Jul 20, 2005
4,890
2,253
Poti was a solid defenseman.

People hated him because he rarely used his body but mostly because Sather traded York to get him.

If Smith had drafted Poti and Sather traded him for a small forward who didn't perform, people would still be complaining about it.

Rozsival was usually very solid but was prone to horrendous mental errors.

Both got more grief than they deserved. Personally I had very little patience with Rozy.

I want no part of Heatley. He skates in quick sand. He is the opposite of what this team needs.
 

GAGLine

Registered User
Sep 17, 2007
23,493
19,469
We could almost definitely get Heatley at the deadline from MN for not much. Last year of his contract...numbers are down but improving of late.

thoughts?

We are currently projected to have $9,341,234 in cap space at the deadline. You want to spend 7.5 mil of that on Heatley?
 

Thirty One

Safe is safe.
Dec 28, 2003
28,981
24,354
Poti was a solid defenseman.

People hated him because he rarely used his body but mostly because Sather traded York to get him.

If Smith had drafted Poti and Sather traded him for a small forward who didn't perform, people would still be complaining about it.

Rozsival was usually very solid but was prone to horrendous mental errors.

Both got more grief than they deserved. Personally I had very little patience with Rozy.

I want no part of Heatley. He skates in quick sand. He is the opposite of what this team needs.
Also, the Rangers played him mostly on the right side in an era when it wasn't yet cool to discuss what side a defenseman played on. He played almost exclusively LD with the Isles and Caps.
 

Thirty One

Safe is safe.
Dec 28, 2003
28,981
24,354
We are currently projected to have $9,341,234 in cap space at the deadline. You want to spend 7.5 mil of that on Heatley?
How much do you want to add? I like the idea of Heatley because there will likely be almost no market for him.
 

McRanger

Registered User
Sponsor
Jul 20, 2005
4,890
2,253
Also, the Rangers played him mostly on the right side in an era when it wasn't yet cool to discuss what side a defenseman played on. He played almost exclusively LD with the Isles and Caps.

Funny that you mention it, as I was thinking about that Leetch-Poti pairing and almost mentioned that myself.

For two offensive players, they were a surprisingly effective defensive pair. Especially on the PK.
 
Jan 8, 2012
30,674
2,151
NY
People want to trade anything for Danny Heatley? He was a ****in all star in 07. That ship has sailed. **** that ****.
 

bernmeister

Registered User
Jun 11, 2010
27,756
3,754
Da Big Apple
How do you propose that we take 3 steps forward instead of 1 step forward?

Quality assets cost.

We need to "repurpose" certain guys.

In addition to moving out small-medium pieces for an upgrade, we need to move a guy like Stepan for a quality upgrade on what we need.

Of course, I have been saying that for 'coupla years now, and was rebuffed.
Slowly but surely, you guys are coming around.

You don't want to, but you are.

The emergence of Kreider as our dominant F, coupled with the surprise of Zuc, means Stepan can/should be dealt, depending upon the return.
 

bernmeister

Registered User
Jun 11, 2010
27,756
3,754
Da Big Apple
Honestly, with the East being such a turd-party this year, I really have a hard time seeing the Rangers doing anything major, much less blowing it up (which lets face it, trading Girardi or Callahan would be) until right up to the trade deadline.

For me, the worst possible situation would be that we continue to play roughly .500 hockey, making the playoffs as a 5-8 seed, and in the process hold onto both Girardi and Callahan, thus having to give both raises this summer or lose them for nothing. Only to get bounced yet again in the first or second round.

Plain and simple there have just been too many years of mediocre hockey played by this franchise, and if the organization decides not to make major changes, all I can see is more of the same. For those who want to resign Cally and G, where and what do we use to get better? If we resign those two, our best bet is the cap space created from buying out Richards. The problem is there's just no real first line, elite talent available down that road anytime soon.

And really, if you look at how this team has performed over the last few years, with the current core, it's hard to not see a downward trend. Everyone clings to 10-11, which admittedly was my favorite season in a looong time, but we didn't even make the Finals(not to mention that was a year without Crosby for the Pens). And as good as that Ranger team was, they were still flawed enough that they couldn't avoid going to 7 games with both the 8th and 7th seeded teams. Their inability to dominate those teams, and shorten the series, contributed majorly to them being physically worn out by the time they faced the Devils. Then the next year, the team did worse in the regular season, and in my opinion never even had a chance in the Bruins series. Outside of Nash, there was just absolutely no threat to create any kind of offense or score goals.

Now we come to the present season, and I think the team's record and performance on the ice speaks for itself. I'm having a real hard time figuring out what free agent is going to come turn around this team. Kreider and McDonagh aren't going anywhere. You don't resign Callahan and Girardi and then trade them that year or even the next. DZ isn't bringing back top line talent and as it stands the team won't be drafting high enough to grab an impact player who's going to be able to make a difference anytime soon. Sadly, other than McIlrath the team's prospect depth is probably the thinnest it's been in a long time. There are simply no elite or A grade forward prospects in the system much less anywhere near contributing meaningfully anytime soon for the big club (yes, I no longer consider Kreider a prospect). So for those who want to stand pat, where is the help going to come from? How is this team plus 1 big name free agent going to become a legit Stanley Cup threat? Isn't the whole signing big name free agents thing exactly what people bemoan the Rangers for constantly doing?

I know it's not worth much, but my vote is now officially in favor of a rebuild. The goal is to win the Cup, not consistent mediocrity. Without significant changes, there will be no significant change, and we will be left with a somewhat above average team, without a real shot at the Cup, both for now and the immediate future. It's getting old. I've loved this core and loved watching them grow, but it's time to try and move forward. I'd rather watch the Rangers win a Cup than watch Callahan's entire career be in Rangers blue. I'm a Rangers fan before I'm a Cally, G, Staal or even Henrik fan. I want a Cup, and just like 94, I'll take it whether or not it's the result of free-agency, trades, or homegrown talent.

I agree as to the "rebuild".
However, consider we DO have some nice prospects. Just not ready for NHL today.

If we re-sign Cally / Girardi, should only be if we can get a number we can live with if we are stuck wit them, in case we decide to trade during next year.

Would prefer to trade now.
 

Nightshift

Registered User
Mar 22, 2013
219
0
Stepan is on my short list of young available forwards. Id sacrifice a little defensive stability and youth for some more skill and speed at C. He should in no way be untouchable.
 

Hire Sather

He Is Our Star
Oct 4, 2002
31,738
5,454
Connecticut
Poti was a solid defenseman.

People hated him because he rarely used his body but mostly because Sather traded York to get him.

If Smith had drafted Poti and Sather traded him for a small forward who didn't perform, people would still be complaining about it.

Rozsival was usually very solid but was prone to horrendous mental errors.

Both got more grief than they deserved. Personally I had very little patience with Rozy.

I want no part of Heatley. He skates in quick sand. He is the opposite of what this team needs.

I was so upset the day we traded York for him.

I remember I stayed home from school on deadline day, like every year.. and furiously followed on TSN.ca (This was before we got to see the deadline day show here in the states)

Heard the rumors all week about York for Poti but 3 PM passed and no deal.. but about 15 minutes later it came across the board.. Poti + Rem Murray :shakehead
 

GAGLine

Registered User
Sep 17, 2007
23,493
19,469
How much do you want to add? I like the idea of Heatley because there will likely be almost no market for him.

If we are adding players, I'd like for those players to be useful. If we are adding Heatley, that leaves little cap space to add anyone else, and I don't feel that Heatley would be useful.

Whose spot would Heatley take? Poo has just as many points in 3 less games. Heatley isn't a defensive forward, he isn't going to play on the 4th line, kill penalties or be a physical, agitating presence. What does he add to this team?
 

Thirty One

Safe is safe.
Dec 28, 2003
28,981
24,354
I was so upset the day we traded York for him.

I remember I stayed home from school on deadline day, like every year.. and furiously followed on TSN.ca (This was before we got to see the deadline day show here in the states)

Heard the rumors all week about York for Poti but 3 PM passed and no deal.. but about 15 minutes later it came across the board.. Poti + Rem Murray :shakehead
So sad that we got a much better player :(
 

bernmeister

Registered User
Jun 11, 2010
27,756
3,754
Da Big Apple
Falk fits his position just as well. We have Allen who could be better than both Moore and DZ. McIlrath will command a roster spot in the next year. Skjei is coming up the ranks very quickly.

You trade assets like Del Zotto for positions of need.

2c. 2w. 4 rd.

His value is dropping every day, every game.

MDZ, once given steady mins exclusively at LD, has greatly improved.
His value is improving with that performance.
 

OverTheCap

Registered User
Jan 3, 2009
10,454
184
Maybe Heatley can be this year's version of Jokinen and screw up in the shooutout during the final game of the season when the playoffs are on the line.
 

Boom Boom Geoffrion*

Guest
In addition to moving out small-medium pieces for an upgrade, we need to move a guy like Stepan for a quality upgrade on what we need.

On what we need? We need Centers.

Richards will get amnestied this summer.

That leaves us with Stepan-Brassard-Miller-Boyle/Moore.

You want us to move Stepan for a quality upgrade? We need centers. Personally I'd shop Brassard, considering he's less effective offensively and defensively than Stepan. And will cost more than Stepan. And is older than Stepan. It's a no brainer.

The only reason why you want to move Stepan is because he doesn't have blazing speed. That's it. That's a piss poor reason to want to move someone.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad