The thing is honestly I'm just not sure we can follow the Pittsburgh/Chicago template because their players may quite frankly be better than ours.
Not all high draft picks are equal, we don't have a Crosby or Malkin and honestly Patrick Kane may be more skilled than any individual we have as well. And then there's Toews.
Maybe if we opted to tank 1-2 years earlier maybe we are talking about a core of Stamkos + Tavares + Hall or something. Then I would agree a rapid ascent to the top of the NHL would be expected.
But Hall is our best player, whereas in the above scenario he'd probably be third best by probably a decent margin. That's a big difference.
Not to say our kids are bad, they're all going to be very good players, but like the Sedins, it may take a little while longer for them to develop.
LA's situation is a little bizarre to be honest, how often does a team trade two 20-something All-Star caliber centers, and they by some weird stroke of fate end up on the same team? Holmgren is a little crazy and Columbus got hosed on the Carter situation. That rapidly accelerated their window on top of the fact that they didn't even have to give up any of Kopitar/Doughty/Quick/Brown to get them.
It would be like circumstances shifting so that we ended up getting Shea Weber + Eric Staal or something and only giving back Paajarvi, no.7 pick, Gagner, Hemsky, and Petry or something. Yes, in that case our window would accelerate rapidly too.
I agree that the Penguins model cannot be matched as they have 2 of the league's 3 best players, but I don't at all think the Hawks model is unrealistic. RNH, Hall & Eberle bring all of the attributes Toews and Kane do. The things that separate the Hawks & Oilers is defense and depth. The core pieces are there (Toews/Hall, Kane/RNH, Hossa/Eberle, Sharp/Yakupov). The biggest piece needed for the puzzle is a Duncan Keith. Craig Button thinks Klefbom's biggest comparable is Seabrook. Obviously that could take a few years, and in a perfect world J. Schultz would turn into Keith. The biggest worry is that we may not have time for that.
Ideally, to follow the Hawks model:
Hall-RNH-Eberle
Gagner-(1)-Yakupov
Paajarvi-(2)-(3)
Hartikainen-(4)-(5)
Brown
1- Big C, doesn't have to be an offensive stud. Chicago uses Handzus/Bolland (Acquired via trade: Umberger? Kesler? Couturier? Ott? Lecavalier? Stastny? Grabovski?)
2- Monahan? J. Mitchell, Leino, Z. Smith
3- MacArthur, Stafford, Bickell, Latendresse, PM Bouchard, Stalberg, Torrrs
4- Lander? B. Boyle, Lapierre, Gaustad
5- Latendresse, PM Bouchard, Torres
Bottom 6 of two way forwards that can ship in offensively, half of them big players. NOT guys like Smithson(no offense), Belanger(no offense, toughness), Smyth(no offense, toughness).
Smid-(1)
(2)-Petry
Belov-J. Schultz
Klefbom
1- Big minutes eater, puck-moving defenseman
2- Veteran top-4 defenseman, very responsible defensively
I'm sure there's great forward candidates that I missed, this was all off the top of my head.