Liver King
Registered User
- Jan 23, 2016
- 7,440
- 5,276
puljiI dunno but I feel like Stone can allow Pulji to ignite his potential again
Question, would you rather trade Dzingel for a 1st on a contender or trade him straight up for Pulji
I dunno but I feel like Stone can allow Pulji to ignite his potential again
Question, would you rather trade Dzingel for a 1st on a contender or trade him straight up for Pulji
cause they wan't to make the playoffs and they feel Poolparty is going to breakout.EDM 1st>Puljujarvi
Puljujarvi>Contenders 1st
Edmonton's 1st would be a juicy pickup. They are out of the playoffs.
So either we get a non-playoff pick in 2019, or if Edmonton exercises some form of protection we get an unprotected 2020 pick.
I can't believe they are supposedly willing to move their 1st over Puljujarvi. In their shoes, I would want to keep the 1st and move Puljujarvi.
I'd take Puljujarvi over a late 1st. I don't follow the draft intently so I can only speak in generalizations, but I'd rather have Puljujarvi over the average 25th-30th overall type prospect.
I dunno but I feel like Stone can allow Pulji to ignite his potential again
Question, would you rather trade Dzingel for a 1st on a contender or trade him straight up for Pulji
I dunno but I feel like Stone can allow Pulji to ignite his potential again
Question, would you rather trade Dzingel for a 1st on a contender or trade him straight up for Pulji
Sure if we send Condon back the other way
I would 1000% trade Spooner for Condon.
Considering the Rangers are already picking up almost $1mil of Spooner's paycheque next year, and considering Condon's escalating salary structure, they make the same salary next year.
Spooner isn't worth his salary, but Condon is literally worthless. Easy peasy.
I'm not sure anyone hates Condon more than me on these boards, so I'd make that deal so quick.
That being said, if Condon is gonna be LTIR'ed for the remainder of his deal it doesn't make financial sense to move him. I have no idea if he's hurt to that extent, but the fact we've heard nothing this year doesn't give me much hope he'll be back.
Regardless, we need to go cheap in nets next season. Half decent goalies are a dime a dozen, we can't keep sinking multiple million into our backups. I'm assuming we won't now that we have an actual goaltending pipeline being built up, but it's a killer for a budget team.
Roster moves = trade incoming?
Not every LTIR player is insured.
"Each team pays a premium based on the salaries of its five highest-paid players, but is free to allocate that coverage how it wishes. Typically, a team will extend coverage to as many as seven players, Daly said. Coverage kicks in when a player misses at least 30 games."
(How does the NHL handle injury insurance?)
Given that Condon was not one of our higher paid players, and the risk of injury for a backup goalie isn't all that high compared to a skater, I'd be surprised if we allocated any insurance to Condon.
He was activated off of IR, and we have a healthy d-core so we don't need him. Thus he was placed on waivers. It's likely not related to a roster move, but if we don't need another AHL defender, it wouldn't surprise me to see the Sens sneak him into an unrelated trade because he makes almost 200k in the minors.
Can't teams carry more players after the deadline?
I actually didn't mind Falk. He was physical and defensively sound. Didn't have a lick of offensive potential though.
Roster moves = trade incoming?
And it gave other teams a chance to have a look ,so maybe he gets picked up... Win/win IMHOI'm thinking it has more to do with Wolanin establishing himself at the NHL level.
Falk was always going to be a band-aid for our massive injury troubles last month. Now we're getting healthy again. He did good at what he was asked to do.
he's coming home
I hope we don't go near Edmonton. I'm more excited about some of our recent late round picks than I am about Puljujarvi. Spooner just takes a roster spot from a young player. I think I'd rather pick up Rattie than either of them, and I don't want him either.