What do you guys think of Bergevin going after Beauchemin?
T Johnson 24 years old
N Kucherov 21 years old
Habs need to get with the program
Desharnais is a weak second line C.
First off, I think DD draws a lot of hate due to factors that are not his fault.Accept him as a 2C one dimensional player and I think you look at him differently and see he does have value, especially at $3.5M per year. I say this because I want people to give reasoned input on this.
What besides DD to get Boedker, who is RFA and can go UFA as early as next year if he only signs for a year. The 2015 1st I assume. Can we do it without Scherbak or McCarron ? They need an Emelin ?
Galchenyuk 21 years old
Gallagher 23 years old
???
Zero chance that line gets put together.
My point is that TB is in the finals with a very young team! Montreal need to make room for some young players with skill. Andrigetto, Hudon, Thomas and Galchenyuk at center are things that need to happen going forward.
I would entertain the idea of trading Price.
The thinking behind it....
Price's value is the best on the team, by far. More than Subban. Price is the type of player that lands you a Malkin. Many teams have proven in the past that you can find good goalies on the trade market (Bishop with TP right now is an example...) so, even though you can't find another superstar goalie like Price, you can find one that will do the job. This team relies on Price way too much and not having him in the net anymore would force a change in the way they play the game. The return for Price would be tremendous... Price to Edmonton for Hall & Yakupov+ type of deal.
Both wingers on the wrong side, I think.
Pleks may get one rookie, but not two.
We need to consider the cap hit, it's 9.5M coming in.
So Plekanec-Emelin are two guys I would throw out there. I think Pittsburgh would gladly welcome Plekanec to play behind Crosby. Two roster players, one prospect, one draft pick, is my guess as to what they'd be looking for. Not quite sure they could ask for anymore.
So, Plekanec-Emelin-one of Pateryn/Beaulieu/Tinordi/Scherbak/McCarron- 1st pick
Say you get Malkin, and Galchenyuk was included in the trade. You assume PAP would be gone somehow and you stack the first line with Pac-Malkin-Gallagher, what is your 2nd line?
Prust-Plekanec-Weise? Maybe you can trade Emelin/Plekanec for a winger or a young guy steps up but with the salary cap even if we got Malkin I don't see how we can find scoring depth past the 1st line. That is why I said he might not be playing with much better wingers because I would assume MT would be forced to "balance" the lines.
Why would they want an aging Plekanec? Emelin has minimal value, our first is practically a second and you're only offered a decent prospect. In a trade for a player of Malkin's caliber, you figure out the cap later, not expect Pittsburgh to fix it for you. There is no trade that does not involve Galchenyuk++ for Malkin. Anything else isn't even a pipe dream.
If we could deal out some of our excess cap (Desharnais, Emelin, PAP), then we could afford to sign one of the better free agents or make a trade for Sharp/Vrbata/JVR. I would also look at smaller pieces like Higgins or Boyle (if he were a UFA). We would also still have at least one of Scherbak/McCarron. It'd be bloody tight, but doable.
Look at what Rick Nash and Tyler Seguin fetched on the trade market. Seguin is aactually more valuable than Malkin since he has far more left to tank.
Pittsburgh might ask Galchenyuk, Pacioretty, and a 1st. They are unlikely get anything close.
well Boston got fleeced in the Seguin trade so i dont think thats a very good example.. same goes for the Thornton trade. you cant really reference a bad trade as someones actual value.
well Boston got fleeced in the Seguin trade so i dont think thats a very good example.. same goes for the Thornton trade. you cant really reference a bad trade as someones actual value.
Look at what Rick Nash and Tyler Seguin fetched on the trade market. Seguin is aactually more valuable than Malkin since he has far more left to tank.
Pittsburgh might ask Galchenyuk, Pacioretty, and a 1st. They are unlikely get anything close.
Context is important. Nash isn't nearly the caliber of player Malkin is, nevermind the latter plays the more sought position. Seguin, despite good production, was still young and hadn't come close to his potential. While not quite as outlandish, the equivalent is saying Joe Thornton should be worth less because Boston traded him for garbage.
And now you've gone the opposite extreme. Asking for both Galchenyuk and Pacioretty is, indeed, ridiculous. But Galchenyuk + Beaulieu + something else is not.
Context is important. Nash isn't nearly the caliber of player Malkin is, nevermind the latter plays the more sought position. Seguin, despite good production, was still young and hadn't come close to his potential. While not quite as outlandish, the equivalent is saying Joe Thornton should be worth less because Boston traded him for garbage.
And now you've gone the opposite extreme. Asking for both Galchenyuk and Pacioretty is, indeed, ridiculous. But Galchenyuk + Beaulieu + something else is not.
Dya think so ?I don't think Malkin will be traded but if he was available and Montreal was on the list of teams he would to play for, we would have to try and go for it.
Plekanec+Galchenyuk+Sherback/Mccaron+1st 2015+1st 2016
For
Malkin+Perron
Or maybe
Plekanecs+Gallagher+Beaulieu+1st 2015 + 1st 2016
For
Malkin+Perron
? Maybe im offering too much but adding a Player of Malkin skill level would make us a contender every year for next 4-5 years