I feel like people are taking the Malkin trade offer seriously...
I would be happy with one of Eberle/Staal/Thornton, what it takes to get them might be tough though.
can we sign Kovalchuk from the KHL ? he would solve almost all our problems
can we sign Kovalchuk from the KHL ? he would solve almost all our problems
It hink something like all GM's need to vote it as okay for him to come back, so it would depend on if they'd say yes. I can't see Betman letting them vote no, though,
It hink something like all GM's need to vote it as okay for him to come back, so it would depend on if they'd say yes. I can't see Betman letting them vote no, though,
I would entertain the idea of trading Price.
The thinking behind it....
Price's value is the best on the team, by far. More than Subban. Price is the type of player that lands you a Malkin. Many teams have proven in the past that you can find good goalies on the trade market (Bishop with TP right now is an example...) so, even though you can't find another superstar goalie like Price, you can find one that will do the job. This team relies on Price way too much and not having him in the net anymore would force a change in the way they play the game. The return for Price would be tremendous... Price to Edmonton for Hall & Yakupov+ type of deal.
Tokarski, Desharnais and a 2nd for Malkin.
1c>2c
So you trade Price for 2 wingers in the hopes that you can find another good goalie via trade down the road?
I see the 1c (Malkin), I assume the 2c is the 2nd?.....or does Tokarski play centre?
A number 1C is worth more than a 2C so DD>Malkin. And Tokarski was drafted as a center but he was a bust so MT forced him to play goalie.
Right, I remember now.
Tokarski isn't good down low, thus why he'll never be a #1 centre. He's a little big for a #1 centre too imo.
My belief is that the only way MB manages to get rid of Desharnais and sell that deal to his coach, would be by getting a bona fide first line center which would clearly make Desharnais redundant, even in the coach's eyes. Someone with a pedigree like Staal or Thornton, however long in the tooth. That in turn would set in motion a separate set of dynamics whereby grooming Galchenyuk as understudy would make sense even to this strategically challenged coach.
From that standpoint, I like this type of deal. The #1 anchor on this team, beyond the coach himself who seem to be staying after all, is this irrational favoritism. Getting rid of the most egregious favorites is a must.
Edit: also, getting a guy like Thornton on the team might cause MB to have a chat with the coach about this silly commitment to grinding.
Hate hate hate the whole idea. Just trade dd for a pick. Why the hell does a gm have to sell an idea to his coach? W. T. F. ?