Not ready to pay a 2nd a 3rd and Vejdemo for a 15 goals scorer, its more of what we have, gotta upgrade on the depth winger we got, not add more.
How about Drouin to the Avalanche for Colorado’s and Ottawa’s first round picks.....reunite the old Moosehead crew
AA is the type of guy whos producing 15 goal in a bad team like detroit. But here. I would not be suprise to raise his stats. Big forward whos able to play in restrict area. A second and a third with hudon. I have no problemWell, AA has only one season of less than 15 goals and currently has more goals than any Canadiens player (even if he's riding the percentages a bit). He'd help the PP too. And he's only 24. For a 2nd and 3rd, of which Montreal has multiple, I'd take him any day of the week. That's a shockingly cheap price. Then you can try to leverage Drouin's pedigree and move him to help the team elsewhere.
AA is the type of guy whos producing 15 goal in a bad team like detroit. But here. I would not be suprise to raise his stats. Big forward whos able to play in restrict area. A second and a third with hudon. I have no problem
AA is the type of guy whos producing 15 goal in a bad team like detroit. But here. I would not be suprise to raise his stats. Big forward whos able to play in restrict area. A second and a third with hudon. I have no problem
No, if it's the reset button they pressed, then moves like this are no more in line then just patching for the playoffs.How about Drouin to the Avalanche for Colorado’s and Ottawa’s first round picks.....reunite the old Moosehead crew
I don't think you get a first in the offseason that's the problem. If a team gives a first now and maybe some prospect swap in our favor, I'd pull the trigger now.I really like Petry and he's definitely playing some of the best hockey offensively in his career but I'm definitely coming around to the idea of trading him. Maybe not now but in the offseason. I'm not even sure what his value is but I bet we could get something really nice
Calgary is feeling fortunate that their GM did not listen to Calgary's roster demolition advocates and trade Mark Giordano at age 30-32.I don't think you get a first in the offseason that's the problem. If a team gives a first now and maybe some prospect swap in our favor, I'd pull the trigger now.
Inconsequential.Calgary is feeling fortunate that their GM did not listen to Calgary's roster demolition advocates and trade Mark Giordano at age 30-32.
I don't think you get a first in the offseason that's the problem. If a team gives a first now and maybe some prospect swap in our favor, I'd pull the trigger now.
And Montreal fans are feeling unfortunate that Bergevin was a coward in 2015 when Montreal had 110 points and Price was the MVP but the coward Bergevin did not want to mortgage his future by trading 2013 1st rounder McCarron 2014 first rounder Scherbak and his upcoming 2015 1st rounder to go get a center....seems like not much has changed in 2019.Calgary is feeling fortunate that their GM did not listen to Calgary's roster demolition advocates and trade Mark Giordano at age 30-32.
So what?? Who says we have to get another Petry with the 1st we get that's really not the goal at all. We've got Brook & Juulsen, you use your higher pick on an elite LD, use the other one to trade up if you can't that's all.
I listed all D drafted at #27, left or right shooters. How many were elite?
I think his point is we don’t have to get a defenceman at #27.
Yes, which means that Petry has to fetch much more than a late first.Or maybe his point is if you want to nab a high upside D with a much higher chance of attaining his ceiling, you gotta be drafting much earlier.
Yes, which means that Petry has to fetch much more than a late first.
So we trade Petry for less than fair value, and have to subsidize the trade with another asset that we could have just used on its own if not for the downgrade?Or you leverage the pick you get for Petry and bundle it with another pick or asset to move up or get a prospect closer to being NHL ready.
So we trade Petry for less than fair value, and have to subsidize the trade with another asset that we could have just used on its own if not for the downgrade?