BaseballCoach
Registered User
- Dec 15, 2006
- 20,769
- 9,129
This off-season could been fun. Would love to see the Leafs get screwed.
It's the danger when you take too long to build up your talent.
This off-season could been fun. Would love to see the Leafs get screwed.
3 first rounders in this draft would set us up for years to come......
Oh please!It's the danger when you take too long to build up your talent.
Oh please!
At least they do have talent!!!!!
And they are really exciting to watch, cant say the same thing about the Habs.
They can sacrifice Nylander and still be able to run with Tavares-Marner, Matthews-Kapanen as duos in their top 6 and have Kadri as their 3rd line C with Johnsson, Grundtsrom, Hyman, Brown, Moore, Bracco to fill in the other spots . Rielly, a RHD from a Nylander trade, Dermott and Liljegren + Sandin coming up shouldn't be a bad D core with Andersen in net.They certainly have talent, can't deny it. But their team is unbalanced and they can't add strength on D and in net without sacrificing probably two of their good forwards.
They can sacrifice Nylander and still be able to run with Tavares-Marner, Matthews-Kapanen as duos in their top 6 and have Kadri as their 3rd line C with Johnsson, Grundtsrom, Hyman, Brown, Moore, Bracco to fill in the other spots . Rielly, a RHD from a Nylander trade, Dermott and Liljegren + Sandin coming up shouldn't be a bad D core with Andersen in net.
If the Leafs are in a bad position, I wish we were too.
FAKE NEWSSo, bait and switch much? Wave at the Crobsys, Ovechkins (that's a clue to the weak logic, as it is now 14 years after he was drafted). Destroy the roster in order to draft "between 1 and 5" (already not the same thing as a sure generational talent), and then cite guys as elite that the majority were not even top 5 picks and none are generational players.
Liljegren, Sandin, Johnsson, Moore, Bracco, Grundstrom will all have fairly cheap deal at less than 2M. Going from Nylander at 6.96M to a D-man that normally makes ~5M is more savings. Marleau going to be off the book in a year + Gardiner/Hainsey off the books and potential dumping Zaitsev... I think they'll be fine.I don't think they will have enough cap space for all that.
See, if I'm running that team I'd rather keep Nylander and move Kadri.They can sacrifice Nylander and still be able to run with Tavares-Marner, Matthews-Kapanen as duos in their top 6 and have Kadri as their 3rd line C with Johnsson, Grundtsrom, Hyman, Brown, Moore, Bracco to fill in the other spots . Rielly, a RHD from a Nylander trade, Dermott and Liljegren + Sandin coming up shouldn't be a bad D core with Andersen in net.
If the Leafs are in a bad position, I wish we were too.
See, if I'm running that team I'd rather keep Nylander and move Kadri.
Long shot, but what if Danault plus Petry for Kadri?
Figs better sign mitchyIt's the danger when you take too long to build up your talent.
Drouin won't be an easy trade to make and it's highly unlikely that Bergevin won't ever do it any way. I would in a heartbeat but then again, Sergachev would still be here if it were up to me.Drouin to Vancouver for Hughes please.
Drouin won't be an easy trade to make and it's highly unlikely that Bergevin won't ever do it any way. I would in a heartbeat but then again, Sergachev would still be here if it were up to me.
Drouin won't be an easy trade to make and it's highly unlikely that Bergevin won't ever do it any way. I would in a heartbeat but then again, Sergachev would still be here if it were up to me.
He sticks out like a sore thumb for sure and we were told that compete and attitude were everything for this new revamped roster. He has talent but seriously for the highest paid paid forward on the team he leaves a lot to be desired.Sergachev would still be here for me, too.
But yeah, MB won't trade his prize possession that soon. Could see it in a season or 2 if he goes on with his lackluster play, cause yeah, he can score and produce and all, but it's funny to see him glide on the ice while whole team has the 'Attitude' thing going on.
That would put them in a worse situation due to Danault and Petry's salaries.See, if I'm running that team I'd rather keep Nylander and move Kadri.
Long shot, but what if Danault plus Petry for Kadri?
They get a cheaper replacement for Kadri, plus a top 4 veteran defenseman.
Unless they can get a stud dman for Nylander
I justjust tho of something.
Mtl trades : Alzner, 3rd round pick
Cgy trades : Neal (15% retained), Prout
Montreal, by doing this, can try Neal on Domi and Drouin line (just as they gave a chance to Tatar).
Calgary can play a lefty on their third pair, one who is great with rookies. Montreal also get a righty as 7th def, or waive them and call back Schlemko, something like this! Montreal have more term with Neal, but he can be used as offense on second or third line, while Alzner being traded opens up more spot for young defenses...
Would that make sense for both teams?
I justjust tho of something.
Mtl trades : Alzner, 3rd round pick
Cgy trades : Neal (15% retained), Prout
Montreal, by doing this, can try Neal on Domi and Drouin line (just as they gave a chance to Tatar).
Calgary can play a lefty on their third pair, one who is great with rookies. Montreal also get a righty as 7th def, or waive them and call back Schlemko, something like this! Montreal have more term with Neal, but he can be used as offense on second or third line, while Alzner being traded opens up more spot for young defenses...
Would that make sense for both teams?