Proposal: Trade Proposal Thread: Off-season edition 3

[Adam Michaels]

If a team can't get Pacioretty extended in order to facilitate a trade, I would look to make the deal enticing for the other team by retaining 50% of the salary. So instead of Pacioretty at $4.5M, they can have him for $2.25M.

 

[crazyd74]

If a team can't get Pacioretty extended in order to facilitate a trade, I would look to make the deal enticing for the other team by retaining 50% of the salary. So instead of Pacioretty at $4.5M, they can have him for $2.25M.

Not against it - but I feel we would be bending ourselves backwards. The return must be worth it.

 

[yianik]

Would love to get Schmaltz!!!

Getting Schmaltz for a non extended Patches would be like hitting a grandslam, twice, in the same inning.

 

[le_sean]

Really? Schmaltz? Come on. He outproduced Max in just his second season in the league, he’s 8 years younger. Why would Chicago ever do that?

 

[Shabutie]

Really? Schmaltz? Come on. He outproduced Max in just his second season in the league, he’s 8 years younger. Why would Chicago ever do that?

Why would they ever trade Panarin for Saad ?

 

[le_sean]

Why would they ever trade Panarin for Saad ?

How many Cups has Max won with the Blackhawks?

The trade was stupid but there’s other reasons it was made. Poor comparison.

 

[Shabutie]

How many Cups has Max won with the Blackhawks?

The trade was stupid but there’s other reasons it was made. Poor comparison.

Not really - that trade required Bowman to overestimate the impact that one mediocre player could have on their success. He could very well do the same for Pacioretty.

 

[le_sean]

Not really - that trade required Bowman to overestimate the impact that one mediocre player could have on their success. He could very well do the same for Pacioretty.

Yes, a player with proven Cup success, which is the opposite of Max.

 

[Shabutie]

Yes, a player with proven Cup success, which is the opposite of Max.

So what you're saying is that maybe they'd trade Schmaltz for Shaw?

 

[le_sean]

So what you're saying is that maybe they'd trade Schmaltz for Shaw?

Now that might make sense

 

[Sterling Archer]

Why would they ever trade Panarin for Saad ?

Saad was EXTREMELY well liked in that locker room and the players asked to get him back.

 

[yianik]

Saad was EXTREMELY well liked in that locker room and the players asked to get him back.

Notably Toews and Kane

 

[NotProkofievian]

Saad was EXTREMELY well liked in that locker room and the players asked to get him back.

Okay, but who cares?

 

[Sterling Archer]

Okay, but who cares?

?????

 

[smirob]

Buffalo seems like a perfect trading partner if we want a young lhd....They could still use a winger to play in their top 6 next year and they currently have 3 first round picks.

Something around Ghule, 1st and a roster player would interest me.

Condition on their 1st being that if he resigns we get the highest pick of the three

 

[Habs Halifax]

Getting Schmaltz for a non extended Patches would be like hitting a grandslam, twice, in the same inning.

More like hitting a grand slam after a 13 pitch at bat. It’s like expecting a pop fly, base hit, or grounder and bam.. grand slam out of nowhere after so many attempts (pitches) to get him out

 

[Habs Halifax]

Why did the Blackhawks make that trade dumping Hossa’s cap hit? I know they had to be below the cap before the season started and then move him to LTIR after but I don’t think that would of been a major problem?

They got to be trying to work something else out?

 

[vokiel]

Why did the Blackhawks make that trade dumping Hossa’s cap hit? I know they had to be below the cap before the season started and then move him to LTIR after but I don’t think that would of been a major problem?

They got to be trying to work something else out?

Contract limit issues maybe?

 

[tooji]

The target has to be beaudoin. French canadian, puck moving LHD... It makes too much sense

 

[vokiel]

The target has to be beaudoin. French canadian, puck moving LHD... It makes too much sense

No, you don't target recently drafted prospects.

 

[tooji]

No, you don't target recently drafted prospects.

Why not? Look at the Duchene trade with Girard. Worked out well for the Avs.

If it's the hawks its gotta be beaudin or chad krys. Both puck moving LHD with high upside.

 

[Sterling Archer]

In a dream scenario, if the Habs were to trade Patches to Chicago or any other team for a center prospect like Schmaltz etc and a 1st, then flip a first and a prospect in a similar package to Columbus for Panarin and we end up with the center and Panarin and a 1st in 2019. Of course this is simplistic and we'd probably have to add a young roster player or two in the deal which is fine as we have an abundance of signed players as it is. so we'd end up with something like:

Panarin Schmaltz Gally
Drouin Danault Lehkonen
Domi Peca Armia
Byron Hudon DLR Plex Shaw Scherbak McCarron DLo (everyone here is trade fodder to add for Panarin and trade at the deadline to get more picks in 2019/2020)

With Poehling and Kotkaniemi likely both joining the team next year.

 

[DAChampion]

If a team can't get Pacioretty extended in order to facilitate a trade, I would look to make the deal enticing for the other team by retaining 50% of the salary. So instead of Pacioretty at $4.5M, they can have him for $2.25M.

Good, but I doubt that really changes the value.

 

[Price4Prez]

It's a new reality these days. Players have too much leverage in these situations. Even with no,NTC or NMC in their contract, by refusing to sign and ext. wih the new team, they basically end up nixing the deal because the value isnt the same.

 

[Le Tricolore]

It's a new reality these days. Players have too much leverage in these situations. Even with no,NTC or NMC in their contract, by refusing to sign and ext. wih the new team, they basically end up nixing the deal because the value isnt the same.

For now, sure, but at the deadline rentals still go for a lot.