Joeyjoejoe
Registered User
- Dec 18, 2015
- 6,174
- 8,742
The conditional makes even less sense - if he plays in at least 30 games for StL we give them a fourth round pick? The f*** for?lmao why did we add a pick?
lmao why did we add a pick?
Maybe STL is paying Stanford’s contractlmao why did we add a pick?
lmao why did we add a pick?
Is St. Louis paying some type of bonus for us? That's usually what happens when we add picks to trades.
Nope, no signing bonus. 1 year contract takes him to UFA. I'm very very confused about why we added a conditional pick that triggers if Logan plays more than 30 games for StL. I mean, plays less than a certain amount kind of makes sense to me but the other way around is just a head scratcher.Is St. Louis paying some type of bonus for us? That's usually what happens when we add picks to trades.
I'm curious why the Sens would be adding a 4th round pick if Brown plays 30 games, that must be backwards?
"Congrats, Brown seems to have worked out for you guys in some way, here's a 4th from us as a thank you"
If that was the case, the condition makes zero sense. If he meets a game requirement it means the trade was working out for the Blues. They get a better pick from us if the trade works out better for them, seems incredibly backwardsI'd guess because Sanford is an NHL player
If I had to guess, I’d say yes lol
If Logan plays 30 games the Sens send a 4th, if he does't meet that requirement, Sens add nothing.What's the actual condition?
You know what they say about the …. LolIf that was the case, the condition makes zero sense. If he meets a game requirement it means the trade was working out for the Blues. They get a better pick from us if the trade works out better for them, seems incredibly backwards
If Logan plays 30 games the Sens send a 4th, if he does't meet that requirement, Sens add nothing.
Must be something messed up there communication wise, makes no sense that way