Mort Divine
Registered User
I wonder if it'd be possible to try and get Bogosian out of Winnipeg or if that ship has long since sailed.
No one. This is also the correct answer. Real talk: This team is two legitimate top-four defenseman and a sniping winger for Pavel away from being a true Stanley Cup contender. They can't achieve that status by acquiring players at the deadline. Thus, acquiring "rentals," even as high-profile as Iginla, would be pointless. I doubt they'd be the high-bidder on him anyway.
Here is what we know about the deadline:
-Difference making players are not usually available unless they are a pending free agent and unlikely to resign
-Difference makers that do become available are almost always forwards, not defenseman (Hossa, Kovalchuk, etc.). You need to go all the way back to Chelios, Bourque and Blake to see real high-impact D traded at the deadline.
-There are no good upcoming UFA defenseman. Hence, very few will be on the market.
-Those few that are on the market will be highly sought after. Legit, top 4 D are always in high demand. I don't want to overpay for a guy like Bryan Allen, Tomas Kaberle or Tim Gleason.
None of this takes into account the short season, and the likelihood that there will be even fewer sellers than usual at the deadline.
Pass.
-
Hamrlik looking like a likely candidate to be shipped to a contender to shore up someone's blueline. Would be the type of guy I'd be okay with adding, if the price is right.
Kronwall - Ericsson
Smith - Hamrlik
Quincey/Colaiacovo/Kindl/Lashoff/Huskins - White
or something.
Kindl + 2nd for Hamrlik + 4th?
This is the kind of deal that I want to avoid. To describe Hamrlik as anything beyond "serviceable" at this point would be charitable. The guy has name recognition and used to be a minute eater, but now he's just a body.
I don't think adding him to our blueline does anything but add an extra body for "depth." I don't think it changes our status as likely first-round fodder. Giving up Kindl and a 2nd, in what people say is supposed to be a deep draft seems like harsh overpayment, imo.
I agree with a lot of what you are saying. I really do. That being said, PK Subban is looking more and more every day that he and Montreal will be parting ways and I know I'm not alone in thinking he'd be a great addition to the Red Wings blue line. Depending on the price (that you have clearly outlined) he may be worth investing in.
I agree, but it is the type of trade (ballpark) that I think Holland would make. I wouldn't be heart broken if it happened. And why does it matter if we give our 2nd when we are just going to flip our 1st for 2 2nds anyway?
Subban would be the kind of player that the Red Wings would most certainly be interested in acquiring. However, since signing his recent "bridge contract," I don't think Montreal has any interest in trading him. Unless you know something I do not, that ship has sailed.
He's a RFA an he has shot down every proposal Montreal has made and are still worlds apart. They might very well be entertained in handing his rights to Detroit where the wings can work a contract out.
http://http://www.torontosun.com/2013/01/26/canadiens-pk-subban-remain-far-apart-in-contract-talks
Lets say we do something smart like I don't know, sell a few redundant bottom six guys.
What could we get for Miller?
What could we get for Eaves?
2nd or 3rd rounders be ok? (I have seen alot of 5th rounders for equal players, so maybe that is all we can get for them)?
We're going to trade for one of: Leopold, Ehrhoff, Yandle, Bouwmeester. Book it.
I wonder if it'd be possible to try and get Bogosian out of Winnipeg or if that ship has long since sailed.
I heard a rumor about a supposed oilers trade offer Whitney and Omark for Abdelkader....
I heard a rumor about a supposed oilers trade offer Whitney and Omark for Abdelkader....
BTW, Hudler has as many points as Filppula right now (seven), but Hudler has played six games to Filppula's 12 and Hudler, unlike Filppula, is the best player on his line.