Trade Deadline Thread: GOLDEN CHAOS

Status
Not open for further replies.

Hodgy

Registered User
Feb 23, 2012
4,311
4,308
Totally. I don't blame them for it either.

I think if Pettersson signs a month earlier we have Guentzel here now instead of Lindholm ... and that would have been significantly better. But spilled milk, I guess.

By all reports, Guentzel wasn’t available a month earlier at the all star game. Pittsburgh was always going to wait until the deadline with him. If they were in the playoffs they wouldn’t have traded him.
Bunting is basically Kuzmenko in different clothing and he was apparently a desirable centerpiece for Pittsburgh.
He’s not though. Kuzmenko is a 5.5 million dollar soft winger that wasn’t producing and was being health scratched. And his new team, I understand, also healthy scratched him so obviously they don’t think much of him either. Bunting is at least producing at a reasonable rate and makes one million less.
 

Hodgy

Registered User
Feb 23, 2012
4,311
4,308
@Hodgy Turns out the Flames didn’t healthy scratch Kuzmenko. Apparently got really sick and that’s why he missed two games.
My bad.

Bunting was scoring at a .60 ppg for 4.5 million which isn’t totally out of whack.

Kuzmenko was scoring at .48ppg for 5.5 million and was being health scratched by his team.

So I think Kuzmenko was the bigger dump, but it was closer than I thought.
 

racerjoe

Registered User
Jun 3, 2012
12,182
5,877
Vancouver
Totally. I don't blame them for it either.

I think if Pettersson signs a month earlier we have Guentzel here now instead of Lindholm ... and that would have been significantly better. But spilled milk, I guess.

I disagree, it just has never been JR's MO. He finds his player early and makes his move and by all accounts Guentzel wasn't available then.
 

MS

1%er
Mar 18, 2002
53,611
84,145
Vancouver, BC
My bad.

Bunting was scoring at a .60 ppg for 4.5 million which isn’t totally out of whack.

Kuzmenko was scoring at .48ppg for 5.5 million and was being health scratched by his team.

So I think Kuzmenko was the bigger dump, but it was closer than I thought.

Bunting was awful at ES for Carolina and propped up by a bunch of PP points. Takes a lot of penalties but doesn't throw any hits. He's not the same player as Kuzmenko but he's a very flawed player who is bad defensively and didn't generate anywhere near his cap hit in terms of value. And he wasn't a season removed from scoring 39 goals.

I disagree, it just has never been JR's MO. He finds his player early and makes his move and by all accounts Guentzel wasn't available then.

I don't think we would have had Lindholm in our sights as the 'early target' if there wasn't so much concern about where we sat at C for 24-25.
 

RandV

It's a wolf v2.0
Jul 29, 2003
26,858
4,950
Vancouver
Visit site
The fact that Nic Dowd was not traded after all the posturing about how he was worth a first. Is hilarious to me would not have been a bad target if the price was like a third.
Well he's signed another year, and Washington will probably want to take another shot next season. Main thing I wanted to point out though is this is how Paul Gaustad once got traded for a 1st round pick at the deadline. Anything less isn't really going to move the needle much so you can't blame them for trying.
 

Vector

Moderator
Feb 2, 2007
23,200
36,335
Junktown
Unrelated to todays deadline but I still find it very funny that the in Gaustad trade ultimately only the Flames came out as losers.

Predators: Gaustad & Saros
Sabres: Girgensons
Flames: Jankowski(just signed an extension with the Predators!) & Sieloff
 
  • Like
Reactions: mriswith

ChilliBilly

Registered User
Aug 22, 2007
7,124
4,380
chilliwacki
Overall pleased that the Canucks didnt waste any more assets for mediocre crap. The better part of the last 10 years I was pissed that they didnt accrue more draft picks (or prospects). this year I was worried that they would Benning and try "improve" the team and forfeit 20 years of 2nd round draft picks.
 

Siludin

Registered User
Dec 9, 2010
7,337
5,256
It's better to make a deal that makes actual sense, instead of making a deal just to make a deal.
They coulda claimed Bjornfot for depth - there are plenty of ways a waiver claim can make sense.
Besides, there is no way to determine if a move made sense unless we parse it for hours after it happens.
 

VanillaCoke

Registered User
Oct 30, 2013
25,266
11,647
A few thoughts:

- It's interesting that while Allvin was trying to get rid of Poolman's contract, McCrimmon in Vegas is leaning hard into the LTIR space created there. Very different managerial styles.

- The lack of a push for a top6 addition speaks to management's opinion of Suter. They value this player highly.

- The swing forward in the top6 is Mikheyev. Whatever value he has around the league, it seems like this management team values him more. CGY didn't share that opinion though re: Tanev trade.

- The Computer Boys (CAR) get Kuznetsov. I like it for them because it's just primarily money. They have the base for him to succeed. Let's see.
I usually don't watch interviews and just read vectors summaries instead, but I watched Allvins presser twice and I thought it was apparent that cap space was a big factor.

Specifically he said in order to bring someone in, cap would have to go out, obviously thats mik, but they still he's going to rebound (he's not), and they're not prepared to pay alot to lose him. Teams probably asking for pod and/or 1st, and with how pods played it makes no sense to spend that, especially when i think they're going to try hard to sign toffoli/guentz for free in a few months.

Overall it's a bit of a letdown and a mistake not to add anything, with other teams loading up, not even Duhaime or stetcher both cheap, even lemiuex or kessel for free as depth.

But i understand it, and unlike the leafs or oilers it wont affect the actual team, we still got additions for much cheaper than this week.
How the oilers and leafs again, again not even trying to go all in with ultra prime top forwards is unbelievable to me.
I can't see how they're not pushing mcdrai out the door, still no wingers, bad defense, anything happens to skinner and the cup run rides on calvin pickard ....?!?!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Indiana and andora

Jerry the great

Registered User
Jul 8, 2022
472
538
He’s a bit of a diving rat which is a dimension Kuzmenko doesn’t have but he’s a crappy defensive player who had his numbers inflated by linemates in Toronto and isn’t as skilled as Kuzmenko.
I knew he liked to stir the pot, i just, mistakenly thought he dished it out as well.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Indiana

SelltheTeamFrancesco

Registered User
Aug 11, 2015
3,616
3,461
A few thoughts:

- It's interesting that while Allvin was trying to get rid of Poolman's contract, McCrimmon in Vegas is leaning hard into the LTIR space created there. Very different managerial styles.

- The lack of a push for a top6 addition speaks to management's opinion of Suter. They value this player highly.

- The swing forward in the top6 is Mikheyev. Whatever value he has around the league, it seems like this management team values him more. CGY didn't share that opinion though re: Tanev trade.

- BOS is playing some dirty pool here. They floated Lindholm's name, imo. This way, even if things go better for the remainder of the season, he knows a team is waiting for him in FA.

- I thought Zadarov would move to make a lateral RHD trade (Tanev/Walker), My guess is that they weren't getting enough from DAL (who were rumoured to be interested in Zadarov), pre Tanev trade, in order to execute it. Then DAL grabs Tanev instead.

- The Computer Boys (CAR) get Kuznetsov. I like it for them because it's just primarily money. They have the base for him to succeed. Let's see.
Unless he start sharing his cocaine with everyone.
 

valkynax

The LEEDAR
Sponsor
May 19, 2011
9,979
10,693
Burnaby
They coulda claimed Bjornfot for depth - there are plenty of ways a waiver claim can make sense.
Besides, there is no way to determine if a move made sense unless we parse it for hours after it happens.

Our lack of movable assets and cap space are rather limiting, we already did a bunch of work ahead of TDL, and if they think deals near TDL are not worth the cost, I have no issue with them standing down for now.
 

WetcoastOrca

Registered User
Jun 3, 2011
38,347
22,273
Vancouver, BC
Not really surprised by the lack of a big move. We already made our big move in Lindholm a few weeks ago. At forward I think we’re fine with Podzolkin looking solid and Joshua coming back soon. A depth D would have been a good add though. Think we are still thin on D and you need depth for a deep run.
Hopefully that doesn’t come back to bite us.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Indiana

SeawaterOnIce

Bald is back in style.
Sponsor
Aug 28, 2011
15,886
19,053
Probably posted but


Can understand maybe why he wasn't signed. Also willing to guess Podkolzin is probably a better winger for the playoffs than a 1 dimensional powerplay specialist.
 

Nick Lang

Registered User
May 14, 2015
2,036
524
It's funny how Allvin mentions not wanting to part with Willander and Lekkerimaki but none of the trades today included prospects of this calibre. It sounds like he didn't like the available players aside from maybe Guentzel. but again, Carolina didn't give up any top prospects for him.

I was under the impression that was the Pitt ask from us, Lekkerimaki, plus Hoglander, so I'm very glad we passed that up if so. It's also quite possible our 3rd from this year and 2nd from next wasn't as enticing as the Jets similar second and third in the Tofolli deal. Not really sure what else was really worthwhile. Lots of players also went without retention meaning we couldn't afford them without some other moves if I understood that correctly.
 

God

Free Citizen
Apr 2, 2007
10,268
7,009
Vancouver
Bunting was awful at ES for Carolina and propped up by a bunch of PP points. Takes a lot of penalties but doesn't throw any hits. He's not the same player as Kuzmenko but he's a very flawed player who is bad defensively and didn't generate anywhere near his cap hit in terms of value. And he wasn't a season removed from scoring 39 goals.



I don't think we would have had Lindholm in our sights as the 'early target' if there wasn't so much concern about where we sat at C for 24-25.
yeah I looked at carolina's 5v5 stats yesterday and bunting and lemieux managed to be sub-50% xGF% despite playing on carolina where everybody over the past ~3 years has been over 50%
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad