PG Canuck
Registered User
- Mar 29, 2010
- 63,030
- 24,300
Canucks toss in a 2nd rounder even in this trade scenario. Love how we continually do that.Moving Horvat and a 2nd for Hronek, Beauvillier, Raty and a 4th looks pretty decent to me.
Canucks toss in a 2nd rounder even in this trade scenario. Love how we continually do that.Moving Horvat and a 2nd for Hronek, Beauvillier, Raty and a 4th looks pretty decent to me.
Yep. Some things never change. Could have got Chychrun with that package.Canucks toss in a 2nd rounder even in this trade scenario. Love how we continually do that.
You literally couldnt have as Ottawa's offer is more then what we paid. But go ahead make up scenarios in your headYep. Some things never change. Could have got Chychrun with that package.
You literally couldnt have as Ottawa's offer is more then what we paid. But go ahead make up scenarios in your head
Lol how did JT Miller work out. 3 of 4 years out of it at the half way mark.
Worked for him lol.
He's not a ufa. He's cost controlled at almost the same price as hronek for 2 more yrsChychrun being a UFA and Hronek being a RFA makes a huge difference value wise.
He's not a ufa. He's cost controlled at almost the same price as hronek for 2 more yrs
He’s the dumbass kid in class, with no friends but continually tries to fit in.One thing I find very concerning about Alvin is he is totally exaggerating the quality of assets he got back in trade when hes announcing it. The three 1sts bullshit, the Hronek top pairing statement. Lying through his teeth or totally delusional
Only if you're paying attention.His contract expires as a UFA.
Hronek expires as a RFA.
This makes a huge difference in contract negotiations.
His contract expires as a UFA.
Hronek expires as a RFA.
This makes a huge difference in contract negotiations.
Only if you're paying attention.
Ill let Peter Griffin explain this for the people who obviously dont understand how draft picks work
So we are worrying about 3 years from now to access the value of a player? Those arguments are only ever used in the contract year, not in contracts with term. This is moot. Please present me examples of this logic and I'll kindly step back. From what I understand from your posts, u presume to think this is a team to challenge for playoffs and has trust in management, I fail to see how even if that's your logic, adding a superior defenseman with the same term and dollars is different in negotiations. Ur saying if all things created equal, ud take the worse of the 2 d because he's an RFA in 3 yrs?His contract expires as a UFA.
Hronek expires as a RFA.
This makes a huge difference in contract negotiations.
you know hronek can just accept his qo (5.2m) and walk to ufa right? chychrun's deal is better in every way
Which is why it won't happen.
If he keeps current pace, Canucks are going to give him an extension at a fair price.
If we drafted a RD at 13 and he began his career averaging 22 minutes a night over 5 years from ages 20 to 25 with good all around play.... we would be ecstatic.
not sure if this has been posted here, but with what i assume to be the most russians in the league, i'm like 70% sure the canucks are going to try and fit ivan provorov here, which would be very nightmareish for my moral compass
okay, and so how is chychrun's 2 year deal that expires ufa different than hronek's kinda-sorta 2 year deal that expires ufa? i expect hronek to extend but i also expect him to get basically market value (so something like 7m if he keeps putting up points) because his deal isn't that different than chychrun's when you actually look at it
i wonder if there's a struggling winger on the team that has a similar AAVWe literally dont have the cap room
Chychrun being a UFA and Hronek being a RFA makes a huge difference value wise.
not sure if this has been posted here, but with what i assume to be the most russians in the league, i'm like 70% sure the canucks are going to try and fit ivan provorov here, which would be very nightmareish for my moral compass