starsfan86
Registered User
- Sep 27, 2006
- 4,264
- 3,217
Why, because he is willing to state the obvious? It's an honest, if canned answer, that tells us absolutely nothing, which is exactly what he meant to tell us, like every other GM.View attachment 516577
I can’t wait til this jackass is gone.
I like playoff Miro. He’s good at hockey.We will just wait for playoff Miro to show up.
A few years back we had a chart showing what someone wrote were traditional NHL values for trades, at least for draft picks. Not sure how vets factor in tht. However, you are right that Nill, whether that chart or in house, gets pretty stubborn on the value he places on assets. It is why no first round picks, no players drafted in the first round (save Dickinson) haven't been traded, and it's why Hintz was never put in the package for EK. His spidey sense of value isn't off all the time.Honestly ... that's a good thing Nill is publically talking about what it would take to trade Klingberg if you're in the camp that wants to see him moved. That's uncommon for Nill.
That comes off as him negotiating in the press ... selling the idea that they have zero motivation to move him (teams are calling me, I'm not calling them).
This could just be a Honka situation again though where Nill's value is out of whack with reality, and he stubbornly refuses to come off it. The situations are totally different, but it does show he's not lenient in terms of coming off his expected value.
the sharks could have had 64M and some young assets but instead they chose to sign a guy thats never been a point per gameYikes. His production has dropped off a tonne the last 20 or so games.
Next season they will need to figure out what's up with Meier too. He's gonna get 8 mill from them as well, but at at least he's younger than Hertl.
what a hideous core
Erik Karlsson 11.5M for 5 more years
Brent Burns 8M for 3 more years
Logan Couture 8M for 5 more years
Tomas Hertl 8M for 8 more years
Marc-Edouard Vlasic 7M for 4 more years
50% of their cap committed to a bunch of over the hill aging ass mother f***ers
if this is insinuating that the Stars' cap situation is similar to the Sharks' then its just horribly inaccurate
I don't agree with all Nill's moves but I don't have a problem with his canned answers that give little to no information and I don't understand why people get so upset when he uses them.Why, because he is willing to state the obvious? It's an honest, if canned answer, that tells us absolutely nothing, which is exactly what he meant to tell us, like every other GM.
if this is insinuating that the Stars' cap situation is similar to the Sharks' then its just horribly inaccurate
we have one 30 year old making 7M+ beyond 2025I think similar is the perfect word, the Stars situation isn't as severe, but if you don't see any irony in laughing at a team that has started to stink because its bloated contracts are handcuffing them, I'm not sure what to tell you.