Plural
Registered User
- Mar 10, 2011
- 33,712
- 4,867
Based on those reasons it's why I would also go with Matthews.Neither is tough as nails type of player, but Matthews does have a power forward/grinder type element to his game.
Matthews drives hard to the net, board battles and uses his power to protect the puck so based on that i would say Matthews.
I wonder which of them has the bigger bicep
This is what I think of every time I hear Laine’s name. Couldn’t handle a good solid check by McCabe.
I’ll take Matthews.
I highly doubt that came entirely from the hit. He was mauled afterwards for throwing a good hit. Laine should keep his head up.
That is McCabe face after hitting Laine's chin.
Laine should have been gone for the year with that kind of hit. Any player who got hit that hard is not going up.
Laine was back on ice after a week and played shortly after.
Laine is no power forward but he can hold his own ground.
The question is who is the tougher between the 2. it's Laine.
Unless Laine turns into Eric Lindros and starts steamrolling through players to get to the net and score I just don't see a massive difference between the two. Neither are fighters, but cheapshot Ehlers and you can definitely see Laine lose his temper. Personally, I'm of the who gives a shit? side. I'd rather they focus on being a better hockey player than train like Adam Sandler in the batting cages taking baseballs to the skull back in Happy Gilmore.Laine throws the body around quite a bite. Matthews gets into the slot where things are pretty thick. Depends on your definition of tough really.
Matthews is more fragile imo