Parayko is available for the right price (and that price is not that high compared to what many people here might think). #3 Dmen are good but not untouchable.
Dont get me wrong. Parayko is good and has value but Parayko is vastly overrated (like alot of other young dmen).
First off brah, Parayko is the second best dman on our team and is a top pairing dman. But it's cool troll on.
He is the second best dman on our team petro is the best and petro is top5-10 in league. Parayko would be top pairing on half the teams in the league. But it's OK to say he is 3 4 dman. Especially when everyone on this board including other teams fans say he is better than your opinion statesHow is it trolling? You said he's a top pairing d-man and I said he's a notch below that. Considering that when fans judge their favourite teams players they tend to overrate them, you sure you're not overthinking this?
Leafs are looking for a veteran but not too old defensive dman. I think Gunnarsson would be a great guy for their defense and shore up their defensive woes. Cap hits the Leafs take on about 800k in extra cap but 1yr finished earlier.
Why are the Leafs looking for a veteran Dman? Reilly and Gardiner are veterans, Hainsey is really a veteran, Zaitsev is 26 years old. Dermot certainly is an NHLer and Borgman should a Leafs next year and are expected to be long term Leafs.
Leafs have plenty of LHD, so I don't see why Gunner is necessary.
Dunn would require a much better player back. In all honesty he is almost as untouchable as Parayko. 1 year in and already proved he can handle top 4 minutes. Demonstrated amazing hand , great wheels and hockey IQ. Future PP QB.I don't think we want Gunnar back. Dunn would be nice.
What is with the urgency to unload JBo's contract? It's only for one more season. I think a healthy JBo for one more year is more valuable to the Blues than the "pennies" you're aking for. He would be a fine 3rd pairing D while Walman and Mikkola develop, (and neither are ready to step in), and if he isn't healthy, (which is possible, if not probable), he gets put on LTIR, where his contract isn't a problem.
And what's wrong with looking at other options? The value is the cap space it would free up. Not the return. Heck maybe we could ask for a depth D. He's a 5.5 million dollar 35 year old #3rd pairing D (as you labeled him) coming off of a hip injury. His name and history is what gives him value. He has 1 year left? So why not get some value for him instead of walking for nothing next year? JayBouw's best days are far behind. Why bank on LTIR? We're not talking about losing Parayko, Petro, Dunn, or Eddy. We're not talking about 30 year old shutdown swift skating JBouw. We can actually use that cap space for an impact player. We need to surround the current core with talent or they will walk. Every year we wait, we're closer to Schwartz, Schenn, & Petro's contract years. We played fine without Bouw last year. We can find a replacement under half the cost. There's tons of LHD hitting the market. And why not use Gunnarson down the road as our 3PD? If your excuse is that he has a blown knee, then what GM is going to trade for the guy? I use other Blues forums but damn nobody overvalues our players/prospects or acts like we have no other options more than the HF Blues fans. I'm conservative when it comes to trading core pieces but he isn't one of them...
Did you happen to catch that middle pairing Parayko led the Canada-Russia game in TOI by almost two full minutes?Parayko is really more of a strong #5 dman. Just check out his 5v5TOI%QoC and ignore all other stats...
International play doesn’t count because sample size. Nice try tho.Did you happen to catch that middle pairing Parayko led the Canada-Russia game in TOI by almost two full minutes?
Someone should tell their coach that it's silly to play a #3 D that much when you have guys like Ekblad and Vlasic on your roster.
Pass. Some of my fellow Blues fans will disagree, (and I expect to hear about it. ), but I was not impressed with Nylander's performance in the playoffs. He was soft. I agree, small sample size, and he's young enough for that to change, but for now, I would rather keep Parayko. Now before the lectures of "toughness in the new NHL isn't needed" commence, I understand that not every player has to be a power forward, but I draw the line at bailing on a play to avoid a hit. I clearly saw Nylander do this. I thought he was intimidated, and effectively silenced, by the Bruins. Until he grows out of this, I wouldn't trade Nylander for Parayko.Colton Parayko
For
William Nylander
If the leafs sign JT
Rielly - - Parayko
Gardiner - Zaitsev
Really solidifies the leafs D, with Nylander potentially centring Vladamir Tarasenko which would be a deadly duo
Nylander is not a center. So you can't sell him as 1. Parayko has more value than 60 pt wingerColton Parayko
For
William Nylander
If the leafs sign JT
Rielly - - Parayko
Gardiner - Zaitsev
Really solidifies the leafs D, with Nylander potentially centring Vladamir Tarasenko which would be a deadly duo
For the billionth time. f*** no.Colton Parayko
For
William Nylander
If the leafs sign JT
Rielly - - Parayko
Gardiner - Zaitsev
Really solidifies the leafs D, with Nylander potentially centring Vladamir Tarasenko which would be a deadly duo
Dbrowns, This is why i stopped being polite about Hoffman, Patches, and other threads about Parayko/thomas/kyrou/dunn. Doesnt matter how nicely, how many stats/facts we use, how much we need to address actual team needs, how many times we say no, or how many times DA has said he isnt trading for rentals. These fan bases continue to beat the dead horse. So I understand your frustration.For the billionth time. **** no.
Connor Brown
Carl Gunnarsson
I understand not wanting to trade Parayko, he is a good young defenseman. I wouldn't trade him if he was on my favorite team.TOR Fans
We are not trading Parayko for Nylander straight up. Great winger prospect but no thanks.